Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
Published on: July 27, 2021
Efficient Mendelian randomization analysis with self-adaptive determination of sample structure and multiple
Liye Zhang1, Lu Liu2, Jiadong Ji3
1Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China; Institute for Medical Dataology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China.
Abstract:
Mendelian randomization (MR) has emerged as a highly valuable tool for inferring the causal effects of exposures on outcomes in observational studies using genetic variants, typically single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), as instrumental variables (IVs). Standard MR typically involves three steps: inputs of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for both exposure and outcome, determination of IVs, and inference of causal effects. However, existing methods fail to simultaneously account for characteristics of GWAS data, uncertainty surrounding the validity of SNPs as IVs, and efficiency of estimating and testing the causal effect. Here, we developed MR method with self-adaptive determination of sample structure and multiple pleiotropic effects (MAPLE), a method for effective MR analysis. MAPLE utilizes correlated SNPs, self-adaptively accounts for the sample structure and the uncertainty that these correlated SNPs may exhibit multiple pleiotropic effects, and relies on a maximum-likelihood framework to infer the causal effects and obtain calibrated p values. We illustrate the advantage of MAPLE through comprehensively realistic simulations, where MAPLE, compared with another eight MR methods, shows calibrated type I error control and reduces false positives while being more powerful. In three types of lipid-trait-centric MR analyses in UK Biobank, MAPLE produces the most accurate causal-effect estimates in positive-control analyses evaluating the causal effect of each lipid trait on itself; reduces the false positives by 12.5% on average compared with existing methods in negative-control analyses investigating the causal effects of lipid traits on hair color and skin color; and highlights the causal effects of physical activity, alcohol, and smoking on lipid profiles in factor-screening analyses involving 412 trait pairs.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Law of Independent Assortment
Epistasis Analysis
Multiple Allele Traits
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...

