Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Generation of Comprehensive Thoracic Oncology Database - Tool for Translational Research
Published on: January 22, 2011
Protected Time, Resources, and Expectations for Academic Oncology Clinical Research Physicians
David E Gerber1, Nikhil I Khushalani2, Ang Gao1
11Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Background:
In recent years, fewer physicians have entered research-related careers. For those who do, successful high-quality research requires dedicated time and financial support. These resources may vary over time and across centers.
Methods:
In 2019 and 2021, we distributed surveys on physician faculty recruitment, effort, and evaluation to NCCN Member Institutions participating in the NCCN Best Practices Committee. We employed linear and logistic mixed-effect models to assess changes between years and Spearman's rank correlation to evaluate associations between variables.
Results:
Surveys were completed by 16 of 30 invited institutions (53%) in 2019 and by 21 of 31 invited institutions (68%) in 2021. Eight institutions completed both surveys, with a total of 29 completing one or both. Across institutions, the proportion of clinical research faculty ranged from 20% to 90%. Clinical research faculty start-up packages were <$50,000/year at 43% of institutions and lasted ≤3 years at 81%. By contrast, physician-scientist faculty start-up packages were <$50,000/year at 10% of institutions and lasted ≤3 years at 48%. For clinical research faculty, outpatient clinic requirements ranged from 1.5 to 3.5 half-days per week. Although this requirement did not change from 2019 to 2021 (mean, 2.1 vs 2.3 half-days; P=.37), inpatient service requirements decreased (P=.02). Clinical requirements were not associated with institutional faculty distribution or the number of early-career grants received. The proportion of centers that considered clinical productivity in the evaluation of clinical research physician faculty success was 47% in 2019 and 65% in 2021, but this difference was not statistically significant (P=.44).
Conclusions:
Across cancer centers participating in the NCCN Best Practices Committee, clinical research physicians account for a varying proportion of physician faculty, have a wide range of clinical requirements, and appear to be increasingly evaluated according to clinical productivity.
More Related Videos
08:29Ex Vivo Treatment Response of Primary Tumors and/or Associated Metastases for Preclinical and Clinical Development of Therapeutics
Published on: October 2, 2014
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Clinical Trials: Overview
Cancer Survival Analysis
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...