Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Induction and Validation of Cellular Senescence in Primary Human Cells
Published on: June 20, 2018
Characterizing primary and secondary senescence in vivo
Yuko Sogabe1,2, Hirofumi Shibata1,3, Mio Kabata1
1Department of Life Science Frontiers, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
None:
There is robust evidence that senescence can be propagated in vitro through mechanisms including the senescence-associated secretory phenotype, resulting in the non-cell-autonomous induction of secondary senescence. However, the induction, regulation and physiological role of secondary senescence in vivo remain largely unclear. Here we generated senescence-inducible mouse models expressing either the constitutively active form of MEK1 or MKK6 and mCherry, to map primary and secondary senescent cells. Our models recapitulate characteristic features of senescence and demonstrate that primary and secondary phenotypes are highly tissue- and inducer-dependent. Spatially resolved RNA expression analyses at the single-cell level reveal that each senescence induction results in a unique transcriptional profile-even within cells of the same cell type-explaining the heterogeneity of senescent cells in vivo. Furthermore, we show that interleukin-1β, primarily derived from macrophages, induces secondary phenotypes. Our findings provide insight into secondary senescence in vivo and useful tools for understanding and manipulating senescence during aging.
Related Concept Videos
Replicative Cell Senescence
Meristems and Plant Growth
Primary and Secondary Growth in Roots and Shoots
The Effect of Aging on Tissues
Aging
Cellular Clock Theory
The cellular clock theory posits that the human lifespan is closely tied to the finite capacity of cells to divide, a phenomenon governed by telomeres, which are protective caps at the ends of...

