Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Value based interpretation of pulmonary function tests.

P Harber

    Chest
    |December 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Interpreting spirometry results involves two error types: concluding normality (type I) or abnormality (type II). A survey revealed significant professional disagreement on balancing these errors, questioning the 5% false positive rate standard.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Is postal postoperative follow-up in urogynaecology feasible?

    Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2012
    Same author

    Longitudinal analyses of chest radiographs from the European Carbon Black Respiratory Morbidity Study.

    The European respiratory journal·2002
    Same author

    Frequency of occupational health concerns in general clinics.

    Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2001
    Same author

    Time and knowledge barriers to recognizing occupational disease.

    Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2001
    Same author

    Intelligent database generated occupational questionnaire system.

    Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2000
    Same author

    Hypersensitivity pneumonitis from Pezizia domiciliana. A case of El Niño lung.

    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·1999
    Same journal

    Independent Prognostic Contributions of Anti-Ro52 and Anti-MDA5 in Autoimmune-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.

    Chest·2026
    Same journal

    Lung aeration and gas exchange in SGA or AGA infants with moderate-severe BPD: secondary analysis of the PATH-BPD study.

    Chest·2026
    Same journal

    Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality after Negative Low-Dose CT Screening Results.

    Chest·2026
    Same journal

    Symptom prevalence and impact on lung cancer risk in the SUMMIT study.

    Chest·2026
    Same journal

    How I Do It: De-escalation of Prostacyclin-Based Therapy in Patients Treated With Sotatercept.

    Chest·2026
    Same journal

    Eisenmenger Syndrome: The Pulmonology Perspective.

    Chest·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Pulmonary Function Testing
    • Clinical Diagnostics
    • Medical Interpretation

    Background:

    • Spirometric interpretation errors include falsely normal (Type I) and abnormal (Type II) results.
    • Balancing these error types is crucial for accurate pulmonary diagnoses.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess health professionals' opinions on the relative proportions of Type I and Type II errors in spirometry.
    • To evaluate the implications of differing opinions on diagnostic accuracy.

    Main Methods:

    • A survey was conducted among 67 health professionals.
    • Participants were asked about their preferred balance between Type I and Type II spirometric errors.

    Main Results:

    • Major interpersonal and intersituational differences in opinion were observed regarding the optimal balance of Type I and Type II errors.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • This indicates a lack of consensus in spirometry interpretation standards.

    • Conclusions:

    • The findings suggest caution is needed when relying on a standard 5% false positive rate for spirometric interpretation.
    • Disagreement highlights the need for clearer guidelines in pulmonary function testing interpretation.