Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

A High-Throughput Enzyme-Coupled Activity Assay to Probe Small Molecule Interaction with the dNTPase SAMHD1
Published on: April 16, 2021
Intramolecular Versus Intermolecular Bonding in Drug Gemcitabine and Nucleobases: A Computational Study
Natarajan Sathiyamoorthy Venkataramanan1, Ambigapathy Suvitha2, Ryoji Sahara3
1Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering, Dayanada Sagar University, Bangalore 562 112, India.
This study reveals gemcitabine (a chemotherapy drug) forms stable complexes with nucleobases, primarily through hydrogen bonds. Guanine forms the strongest bond, indicating potential drug-DNA interactions.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Molecular modeling
- Drug-nucleobase interactions
Background:
- Gemcitabine is a widely used chemotherapy drug.
- Understanding drug-nucleobase interactions is crucial for drug design and predicting efficacy.
- Nucleobases (DNA/RNA components) are potential binding sites for drugs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the adsorption of gemcitabine on nucleobases.
- To determine the preferred binding configurations and interaction strengths.
- To elucidate the nature of chemical bonding in these complexes.
Main Methods:
- Dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT) calculations.
- Analysis of binding and interaction energies.
- Quantum chemical analyses including MESP, QTAIM, HOMA, and NICS.
- Energy decomposition analysis (DLPNO-CCSD(T)).
Main Results:
- Planar gemcitabine-nucleobase complexes are more stable than stacked or buckled configurations.
- Complex formation is an enthalpy-driven process, stabilized by at least two intermolecular hydrogen bonds.
- Gemcitabine-guanine exhibited the strongest binding, while gemcitabine-thymine showed the weakest.
- Intermolecular NH⋅⋅⋅N bonds are particularly strong, possessing partial covalent character.
- Electrostatic attraction is the dominant force, with dispersion playing a minimal role.
Conclusions:
- Gemcitabine can form stable complexes with nucleobases, with varying strengths.
- The interactions are primarily governed by hydrogen bonding and electrostatic forces.
- These findings provide insights into gemcitabine's mechanism of action and potential interactions with genetic material.
More Related Videos
10:26Profiling Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like Dependent Post-translational Modifications and Identification of Significant Alterations
Published on: November 7, 2019
10:05Genome-wide Mapping of Drug-DNA Interactions in Cells with COSMIC Crosslinking of Small Molecules to Isolate Chromatin
Published on: January 20, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
DNA Base Pairing
Drug-Receptor Bonds
In...
Intermolecular vs Intramolecular Forces
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Drugs that Stabilize Microtubules