Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026
An Instrumented Pull Test to Characterize Postural Responses
Published on: April 6, 2019
Nonlinear analysis of the effects of vision and postural threat on upright stance
Sara E Weinberg1, Stephen Palmisano2, Robert S Allison3
1School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada; Centre for Vision Research, York University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
Background:
Humans maintain upright stance to interact with their surroundings. Linear analysis of these processes fails to address the nonstationary behavior of the human body, whereas dynamical nonlinear approaches consider the underlying dynamics of postural sway. Here, behavior during upright stance was examined using nonlinear methods to provide additional insights into the effects of postural threat (height above ground) and vision on postural control.
Research Question:
Can nonlinear methods provide more comprehensive identification and analysis of height- and vision-related changes in quiet standing?
Methods:
This study is a secondary analysis of a previously collected and published dataset. Twenty young healthy adults performed a 60 s quiet standing balance task under all combinations of: (1) two height conditions: standing at ground level (LOW) and standing 3.2 m above ground level (HIGH); and (2) two visual conditions: eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC). Recurrence quantification analyses (RQA) were performed on centre of pressure (COP) and centre of mass (COM) data to calculate Recurrence Rate (%REC), Determinism (%DET), Entropy (ENT), and Average Line Length (LINE).
Results:
For COP, %DET, ENT, and LINE showed significant effects of vision and height, with the values of each measure being lowest in the HIGH-EC condition. For COM, %DET, ENT, and LINE showed significant effects for vision, with the values of each being lower in the EC compared to EO condition; additionally, %DET was significantly smaller in the HIGH condition compared to LOW.
Significance:
RQA identified differences in sway dynamics across both vision and height conditions that linear methods failed to detect. They represented greater randomness and adaptability in response to increased fear (HIGH) or decreased sensory information (EC). The novel effects observed with these RQA variables suggest nonlinear analyses provide a more robust tool for identifying the effects of postural threat and vision on upright stance.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the drone...
01:25Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it instrumental in...
01:29Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
01:23Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components
As the car advances, its position evolves over time. Quantifying the car's velocity involves computing the time...
01:27Curvilinear Motion: Normal and Tangential Components
The positive direction of the t-axis aligns with the increasing position of the car along the curved path, denoted by the unit vector ut. Simultaneously, the n-axis, perpendicular to the t-axis, dissects the curved path into differential arc segments, each forming the arc of a circle with a radius of...
01:23Actor-Observer Effect