Letter to the Editor: Robustness of osteoporosis risk prediction models with enhanced statistical analyses
Filipe Ricardo Carvalho1, Paulo Jorge Gavaia1
1Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal; Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR/CIMAR LA), University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal; University of Algarve - Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal.
Abstract:
In response to Oka et al.'s letter, we conducted additional statistical analyses to validate the robustness of our osteoporosis risk prediction model using NHANES 2007-2014 data (n = 7924). We evaluated 10 key predictors through Spearman's rho, Kendall's tau, Mutual Information (MI), and Total Correlation. Weight (BMX_BMXWT) and arm circumference (BMX_BMXARMC) showed strong negative correlations with osteoporosis risk (rho: 0.49, -0.47, p < 1e-270; MI: 0.17, 0.15), while age (DEMO_RIDAGEYR) exhibited a positive correlation (rho: 0.33, p < 1e-128; MI: 0.08). Total Correlation (32.68) confirmed significant multivariate interactions among predictors. These findings reinforce the model's predictive strength, addressing Oka et al.'s recommendations and affirming the importance of anthropometric and demographic factors in osteoporosis risk assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Disorders
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Cancer Survival Analysis
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis


