Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Automation of Bio-Atomic Force Microscope Measurements on Hundreds of C. albicans Cells
Published on: April 2, 2021
Rezafungin vs caspofungin for the treatment of invasive candidiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Mohammad Al Diab Al Azzawi1, Wejdan Abdat2, Arina Alhamed3
1Faculty of Medicine, The National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Background:
Severe fungal infection known as invasive candidiasis primarily impacts critically ill alongside immunocompromised patients with high mortality and long hospital stays and creates substantial healthcare expenses. Echinocandins constitute the current standard first-line treatment for invasive candidiasis, with caspofungin being among the most widely used agents, caspofungin is used to treat invasive candidiasis but requires daily intravenous administration, and its pharmacokinetics may vary between patients. A new generation echinocandin antifungal drug called Rezafungin demonstrates an extended half-life through which medical personnel can administer treatment only once per week to improve patient adherence and minimize healthcare costs. This review aimed to compare rezafungin and caspofungin to evaluate their efficacy and safety, and to explore whether rezafungin's pharmacokinetics offer clinical advantages.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing rezafungin and caspofungin for invasive candidiasis in adults. Studies were selected based on predefined PICOS criteria and sourced from PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. After removing duplicates using Rayyan, four eligible trials involving adult patients were included. Data on efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using ROB 2, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 to calculate risk ratios with 95 % confidence intervals.
Results:
Four RCT with 677 patients included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between rezafungin and caspofungin in key outcomes. Global cure at day 14 was similar between the two groups (RR = 1.04, 95 % CI: 0.90-1.20, p = 0.45), as were the rates subgroup anaylsis of blood culture negativity at 24 and 48 h and mycological eradication, and safety outcomes such as, Patients with ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event, abdominal pain, hypokalemia, acute kidney injury, septic shock, and all-cause mortality at day 30.
Conclusion:
Rezafungin is noninferior to caspofungin in the treatment of invasive candidiasis, offering equivalent efficacy and safety outcomes. Its once-weekly dosing regimen presents potential advantages in terms of improved patient adherence and reduced healthcare resource utilization. Future research should focus on larger, more diverse populations and longer follow-up durations to further elucidate the long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness of rezafungin.
Insights
Rezafungin offers comparable efficacy and safety to caspofungin for invasive candidiasis treatment. Its once-weekly dosing may improve patient adherence and reduce healthcare costs.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Invasive candidiasis presents a high mortality risk, particularly in critically ill and immunocompromised patients.
- Current standard treatment, caspofungin, requires daily intravenous administration, posing challenges for patient adherence and healthcare costs.
- Rezafungin, a new echinocandin, offers a once-weekly dosing regimen due to its extended half-life.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of rezafungin versus caspofungin for invasive candidiasis.
- To evaluate the clinical advantages of rezafungin's pharmacokinetic profile, specifically its dosing frequency.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rezafungin and caspofungin.
- Searched major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) for eligible trials.
- Included four RCTs with 677 adult patients, assessing efficacy and safety outcomes using RevMan 5.4.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences were found between rezafungin and caspofungin in global cure rates at day 14 (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.90-1.20).
- Similar rates were observed for blood culture negativity, mycological eradication, and key safety outcomes including adverse events and all-cause mortality.
- Subgroup analyses also revealed no significant differences between the two treatment groups.
Conclusions:
- Rezafungin is noninferior to caspofungin in treating invasive candidiasis, demonstrating equivalent efficacy and safety.
- The once-weekly dosing of rezafungin presents potential benefits for patient adherence and healthcare resource utilization.
- Further research with larger, diverse populations and longer follow-up is recommended to confirm long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness.

