Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

09:10
Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
Published on: August 5, 2021
1.9K
Digital post scan with three intraoral scanning systems - An in vitro study
Kay-Arne Walther1, Sarah Marie Reich1, Bernd Wöstmann1
1Justus Liebig University, Dental Clinic - Department of Prosthodontics, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Journal of Dentistry
|July 12, 2025
Summary
Digital post scan (DPS) feasibility varies among intraoral scanners (IOS). Primescan (PRI) showed superior light delivery for DPS, unlike Trios 5 (TRI) and Medit i700 (MED), impacting post and core accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Digital dentistry
- Dental materials science
- Prosthodontics
Background:
- Digital post scan (DPS) is crucial for accurate post and core (PC) restorations.
- Evaluating intraoral scanner (IOS) performance in DPS is essential for clinical application.
- Light penetration to the preparation's apical part influences DPS accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility of DPS using three different IOS: Primescan (PRI), Trios 5 (TRI), and Medit i700 (MED).
- To evaluate the light reaching the apical preparation during DPS.
- To determine the influence of tooth type and adjacent teeth on DPS feasibility.
Main Methods:
- Fifty clinical post and core cases were 3D printed for virtual analysis.
- Lux-value measurements were taken during DPS using PRI, TRI, and MED.
- Feasibility was assessed by surface deviation (<50 µm) and statistical analysis (ANOVA).
Main Results:
- Significant differences in light reaching the apical preparation were found between PRI, TRI, and MED (p < 0.001).
- PRI demonstrated superior performance, with TRI showing limited feasibility only in specific cases.
- The type of tooth did not significantly influence DPS feasibility (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Primescan (PRI) is recommended for digital post scan due to its superior light emission and feasibility.
- Trios 5 (TRI) and Medit i700 (MED) exhibited inferior results, potentially affecting post and core fit accuracy.
- Intraoral scanner depth of focus is not a reliable indicator for DPS feasibility.

