Performance of Radiomics and Deep Learning Models in Predicting Distant Metastases in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- Peyman Mirghaderi 1, Parya Valizadeh 2, Sara Haseli 1, Hyun Su Kim 1, Arash Azhideh 1, Matthew J Nyflot 3, Stephanie K Schaub 3, Majid Chalian 1
- 1Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (P.M., S.H., H.S.K., A.A., M.C.).
- 2School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran (P.V.).
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle WA (M.J.N., S.K.S.).
- 0Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (P.M., S.H., H.S.K., A.A., M.C.).
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Radiomics and deep learning models show promise for predicting soft tissue sarcoma (STS) metastasis. Deep learning approaches outperform traditional methods, aiding in identifying high-risk patients for targeted monitoring.
Area Of Science
- Medical Imaging
- Oncology
- Artificial Intelligence
Background
- Predicting distant metastases in soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is crucial for patient management.
- Radiomics and deep learning (DL) models offer potential for metastasis prediction, but their accuracy needs evaluation.
Purpose Of The Study
- To assess the diagnostic performance of radiomics and DL models in predicting STS metastases.
- To analyze pooled sensitivity and specificity of these predictive models.
Main Methods
- A meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase.
- Random-effects model to estimate pooled AUC, sensitivity, and specificity.
- Subgroup analyses based on imaging modality, feature extraction (DL vs. handcrafted), and clinical features.
Main Results
- Nineteen studies (1712 patients) included; pooled AUC for metastasis prediction was 0.88.
- DL-based radiomics models demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than handcrafted radiomics models (p < 0.01).
- No significant performance difference was observed when including clinical features (AUC: 0.90 vs. 0.88, p = 0.99).
Conclusions
- Radiomics models, particularly DL approaches, show significant potential for predicting STS metastasis.
- These models can assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients for targeted monitoring.
- Further research is needed to address heterogeneity, external validation, and standardize protocols for clinical integration.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

