Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.6K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.6K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

243
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
243
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

215
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
215
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

806
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
806
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

1.6K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.6K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

266
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
266

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the quality of tabular synthetic data in health care.

PLOS digital health·2026
Same author

Selecting medical research data platforms for translational biomedical research: a five-tier overview and requirement-weighted assessment framework.

Frontiers in digital health·2026
Same author

Improving Meditron for Medical Coding Through Fine-Tuning: A Comparative Evaluation Against GPT-4.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Evaluating Differentially Private Synthetic Data for Multi-Site Clinical Research: A Case Study from 5 Swiss University Hospitals.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Scaling Electronic Consent for Research Integrated into Clinical Routine Processes.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Accurate Yet Privacy-Preserving Determination of Case Numbers Across German University Hospital Health Data.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

Phantom Anonymization: Adversarial testing for membership inference risks in anonymized health data.

Thierry Meurers1, Mehmed Halilovic1, Karen Otte1

  • 1Medical Informatics Group, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany.

Computers in Biology and Medicine
|July 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Quantifying membership inference risk in anonymized health data is crucial for privacy. Our framework empirically assesses residual risks, enabling comparisons between anonymized and synthetic datasets.

Keywords:
Adversarial testingAnonymizationHealth dataMembership inferencePrivacy

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

913
Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

913
Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Data Privacy
  • Cybersecurity

Background:

  • Medical research datasets containing sensitive individual information pose significant privacy risks.
  • Anonymization techniques are vital for protecting health data but quantifying residual risks remains challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel framework for quantifying residual membership inference risks in anonymized tabular data.
  • To adapt and apply techniques from synthetic data assessment for evaluating anonymization effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a framework utilizing a classifier trained to detect target records in anonymized datasets.
  • Employed data anonymized using the same methods as the target dataset for classifier training.
  • Conducted experiments across diverse anonymization strategies and adversarial conditions.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework effectively identifies residual privacy risks in anonymized datasets.
  • Anonymization method effectiveness is contingent on the chosen privacy model and data modification strategies.
  • Significant variations in risk were observed based on how data met predefined risk thresholds.

Conclusions:

  • The framework offers an empirical method for assessing membership inference risks across various anonymization techniques.
  • Enables direct comparison of residual risks between anonymized and synthetic datasets due to shared methodology.