Model-based approach for two-stage group sequential or adaptive designs in bioequivalence studies using parallel and
Florence Loingeville1, Manel Rakez2, Thu Thuy Nguyen3
1ULR 2694 - METRICS : Evaluation of Health Technologies and Medical Practices, University of Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
This study shows that model-based TOST (MB-TOST) is a viable alternative to non-compartmental analysis TOST (NCA-TOST) for bioequivalence studies. Two-stage designs, including group sequential and adaptive designs, reduce sample size, especially for highly variable drugs.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence
- Statistical Methods in Drug Development
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) with two one-sided tests (TOSTs) is standard for pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence (BE) analysis.
- Sample size determination for BE studies relies on assumptions of between/within subject variability (B/WSV).
- Group sequential (GS) and adaptive designs (ADs) offer interim analysis benefits when prior information is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To extend group sequential (GS) and adaptive designs (ADs) to model-based TOST (MB-TOST) for PK BE analysis.
- To evaluate the performance of MB-TOST and NCA-TOST within GS and AD frameworks.
- To compare sample size, type I error, and power across different designs and variability levels.
Main Methods:
- Simulated parallel and two-way crossover designs for a one-compartment PK model.
- Evaluation of NCA-TOST and MB-TOST with one-stage, GS, and AD approaches.
- Assessment under three different levels of initial between/within subject variability (B/WSV).
Main Results:
- Both NCA-TOST and MB-TOST maintained controlled type I error and adequate power in two-stage GS and AD designs.
- Two-stage designs, particularly ADs, reduced sample size compared to traditional methods, especially for highly variable drugs.
- Many AD trials terminated at Stage 1, indicating efficiency gains.
Conclusions:
- MB-TOST is a potentially viable alternative to NCA-TOST for BE assessment in two-stage designs.
- Two-stage GS and AD approaches are effective for sample size reduction in BE studies, especially with high B/WSV.
- The findings support the use of MB-TOST within advanced trial designs for more efficient BE evaluations.
More Related Videos
07:25In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
06:24Generic Protocol for Optimization of Heterologous Protein Production Using Automated Microbioreactor Technology
Published on: December 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence: Overview
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Group Design
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
