Predictive model for CRT risk in cancer patients with central venous access devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Wenjuan Yang 1, Meng Fang 2, Kangqin Cai 1, Qin Pan 1, Cheng Zhang 3, Jiquan Zhang 4
- Wenjuan Yang 1, Meng Fang 2, Kangqin Cai 1
- 1Department of Nephrology, Zigong First People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
- 2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Zigong First People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
- 3Emergency Department, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, Hebei, China.
- 4Department of Nephrology, Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, Sichuan, China.
- 0Department of Nephrology, Zigong First People's Hospital, Zigong, Sichuan, China.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Cancer patients with central venous access devices (CVADs) face a high risk of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT). This review evaluated existing risk prediction models for CVAD CRT, finding most have moderate-to-good performance despite high bias risk.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Hematology
- Medical Informatics
Background
- Central venous access device (CVAD) use is common in cancer patients.
- Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a significant complication with high incidence in this population.
- Early detection and risk assessment are crucial for effective thromboprophylaxis.
Purpose Of The Study
- To systematically review and evaluate risk prediction models for CVAD-related thrombosis in cancer patients.
- To assess the performance and identify key predictors within these models.
Main Methods
- Comprehensive literature search across multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, etc.) up to May 2024.
- Independent screening, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Predictive Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).
- Meta-analysis of Area Under the Curve (AUC) values for model validation.
Main Results
- Nineteen papers identified 29 predictive models; reported AUC values ranged from 0.470 to 1.000.
- Common predictors include D-dimer levels, BMI, and diabetes.
- Combined AUC for six validated models was 0.81, indicating good discrimination, though all studies had a high risk of bias.
Conclusions
- Available CRT prediction models demonstrate moderate-to-good predictive performance.
- Significant risk of bias was noted across all included studies, primarily due to reporting limitations.
- Future research requires methodologically rigorous, multi-center validation and potential development of new models.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
01:29
Venous thrombosis requires effective prevention and treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes and reduce potential complications.Prevention StrategiesHealthcare providers must prioritize preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) for all adult patients upon admission. Interventions depend on bleeding and thrombosis risk, medical history, current medications, diagnoses, planned procedures, and patient preferences. Patients on bed rest should change positions every two hours and, if not...
01:30
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy, also known as CRRT, is a procedural treatment for acute kidney injury (AKI) that gradually removes uremic toxins and fluids while maintaining acid-base balance and stabilizing electrolytes. It is particularly useful for hemodynamically unstable patients. Unlike intermittent hemodialysis, which is faster, CRRT provides a gentler approach over 24 hours, closely mimicking the function of natural kidneys. However, CRRT is not ideal for patients with...

