Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
In Vitro Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Materials for Fixed Partial Dentures
Papala Sesha Reddy1, Mallikarjun H Doddamani2, Ngangbam Johnson Singh3
1Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, RIMS, Putlampalli, Kadapa, YSR (Dt.), Andhra Pradesh, India.
Background:
Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials have revolutionized dental restorations, offering enhanced mechanical properties and esthetic outcomes. However, the fracture resistance of various CAD/CAM materials used in fixed partial dentures (FPDs) remains a crucial determinant of their clinical success.
Materials And Methods:
Three CAD/CAM materials-lithium disilicate, zirconia, and resin-based composite-were selected for the study. A total of 45 three-unit FPD frameworks (15 specimens for each material) were fabricated using standardized CAD/CAM protocols. The frameworks were cemented onto artificial abutments and subjected to thermocycling to simulate oral conditions. Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine, applying a load at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure occurred. The fracture loads were recorded in Newtons (N) for statistical analysis.
Results:
The zirconia group exhibited the highest mean fracture resistance (1,800 ± 120 N), followed by lithium disilicate (1,200 ± 100 N) and the resin-based composite (900 ± 80 N). Statistical analysis using ANOVA revealed significant differences in fracture resistance among the groups (P < 0.05). Failure modes varied, with zirconia specimens predominantly showing cohesive fractures, while lithium disilicate and the resin-based composite exhibited mixed failure patterns.
Conclusion:
Zirconia demonstrated superior fracture resistance compared to lithium disilicate and the resin-based composite, making it a more reliable material for FPDs in high-stress areas. Lithium disilicate remains a suitable option for esthetic regions, while the resin-based composite may be limited to low-stress applications. These findings underscore the importance of material selection based on clinical requirements to ensure long-term success of FPDs.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
03:02Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Stress-Strain Diagram - Brittle Materials
Fatigue
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as the...
Brick Durability, Strength, and Appearance
Fiber Reinforced Concrete
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used to...