Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood
Published on: February 11, 2017
Reliability and Validity Evidences of Tej Emotional and Behavioral Problem Checklist (TEJ-CL) for Child Mental Health
Suraj Shakya1, Sabitri Sthapit2, Mita Rana1
1Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Insights
The Tej Emotional and Behavioral Problem Checklist (TEJ-CL) demonstrates good reliability and validity for assessing childhood emotional and behavioral problems in Nepal. This parent-reported tool effectively differentiates referred children from non-referred ones, supporting its clinical utility.
Area of Science:
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- Psychometric Evaluation
- Global Mental Health
Background:
- Childhood emotional and behavioral problems are a significant concern in Nepal.
- Existing assessment tools may not be contextually appropriate.
- The Tej Emotional and Behavioral Problem Checklist (TEJ-CL) was developed for the Nepalese context.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the TEJ-CL.
- To assess its utility as an add-on and symptom monitoring test for childhood emotional and behavioral issues.
- To provide psychometric evidence for a culturally adapted assessment tool.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional validation study involving guardians of children aged 5-17 years.
- Included referred children from mental health centers and non-referred children from schools in Kathmandu.
- Utilized principal component analysis, coefficient alpha, Spearman's rank correlation, and linear regression for analysis.
Main Results:
- Principal component analysis reduced the TEJ-CL to 65 items, identifying six factors (e.g., externalizing behaviors, anxiety).
- Internal consistency (coefficient alpha) ranged from .62 to .95.
- Referred children scored significantly higher than non-referred children on most factors, indicating good criterion validity.
Conclusions:
- The TEJ-CL shows promising reliability and validity, comparable to established scales.
- The tool is suitable for assessing childhood emotional and behavioral problems in the Nepalese context.
- Future research should explore generalizability and refine discriminatory power.
Introduction:
The Tej Emotional and Behavioral Problem Checklist (TEJ-CL) was developed in Nepalese context to aid assessment of childhood emotional and problems of children. This study aimed to evaluate TEJ-CL's factor structure, reliability, and validity evidences as an add-on and symptom monitoring test.
Methods:
This cross-sectional validation study included guardians of 320 children (age 5-17 years) from tertiary mental health centers in Kathmandu as referred group, along with 601 children from two schools (private and community) in Kathmandu as non-referred group. IRC was obtained ethical approval (ref: 183 (6-11-E)2/073/074 and ref: 776). TEJ-CL, an 89-item parent-reported questionnaire, served as the index test, while referral status acted as the reference standard. Factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest/cross-informant correlations and criterion validity evidence was assessed using principal component analysis, coefficient alpha, spearman's rank correlation and linear regression models, respectively.
Results:
Analysis was done using 179 referred and 412 non-referred individuals based on non-missing data. Principal component analysis in referred sample reduced the number of items of questionnaire to 65 from 89 and indicated six factors: externalizing behavioral issues, anxiety/worries, upset/sadness, somatic concern, miscellaneous syndrome, and severe issues with coefficient alpha ranging from .62 to .95. As criterion validity evidence, referred children showed significantly higher scores than non-referred children across composite and factor scores, except for anxiety/worries factor. Similarly, regression analyses within the referred group demonstrated significant associations between factor scores and specific diagnoses.
Conclusions:
Reliability and validity estimate of questionnaire is comparable to similar empirically based scales. Future research should focus on assessing the tool's generalizability and improving discriminatory indexes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types

