Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

07:55
High-speed Continuous-wave Stimulated Brillouin Scattering Spectrometer for Material Analysis
Published on: September 22, 2017
10.3K
Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine-performance-check (MPC): Collimator device check (CDC)
Michael Barnes1,2, Andrew Dipuglia1, Brad Beeksma1,2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|July 14, 2025
Summary
The Varian machine performance check (MPC) collimator devices check (CDC) offers a reliable method for routine linear accelerator (linac) quality assurance (QA). This tool provides accurate assessment of multileaf collimator (MLC) and jaw positioning, ensuring consistent performance.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Quality Assurance
Background:
- Routine quality assurance (QA) is essential for maintaining the performance of medical linear accelerators (linacs).
- Accurate assessment of multileaf collimator (MLC) and jaw positioning is critical for precise radiation delivery.
- The Varian Machine Performance Check (MPC) Collimator Devices Check (CDC) is a tool designed to streamline linac QA procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the Varian MPC CDC for routine testing of MLC and jaw positioning.
- To assess the performance of the CDC within an American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) compliant linac QA program.
Main Methods:
- The study assessed MLC positioning, MLC backlash, jaw positioning, and jaw parallelism using the CDC.
- Repeatability, concordance with conventional QA methods, and sensitivity were evaluated.
- Measurements were conducted on four linacs over five months, comparing CDC results to established tests like the picket fence and EPID-based methods.
Main Results:
- The CDC demonstrated high repeatability for MLC positioning (0.02 mm) and jaw parallelism (0.009°).
- Concordance with conventional methods was observed within acceptable limits for MLC and jaw parameters.
- The CDC showed good sensitivity in detecting introduced errors, with correlation coefficients for MLC backlash up to 0.9.
Conclusions:
- The Varian MPC CDC provides an acceptably equivalent assessment of MLC and jaw positioning compared to standard methods.
- The CDC can be effectively integrated into a linac QA program for routine testing.
- This tool contributes to efficient and reliable linac QA, ensuring patient safety and treatment accuracy.

