Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

2.1K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
2.1K
Outliers and Influential Points01:08

Outliers and Influential Points

4.2K
An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the...
4.2K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.4K
What Are Outliers?01:12

What Are Outliers?

4.2K
Outliers are observed data points that are far from the least squares line. They have unusual values and need to be examined carefully. Though an outlier may result from erroneous data, at other times, it may hold valuable information about the population under study and should be included in the data. Hence, it is crucial to examine what causes a data point to be an outlier.
The z score is used to find outliers or unusual values. It should be noted that any values beyond -2 and +2 are...
4.2K
Modified Boxplots00:57

Modified Boxplots

10.1K
A standard box and whisker plot informs us about the spread of the data in a given sample. One can identify the minimum value, maximum value, first quartile value, second quartile or median value, and third quartile.
However, the box plot does not tell the reader about outliers - values that lie far from the center of the data. We can modify the standard box and whisker plot to identify the outliers and visualize the actual spread of the data in a sample.
Initially, we calculate the adjusted...
10.1K
Chi-square Analysis02:46

Chi-square Analysis

38.7K
The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
38.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When to Adjust for Multiple Testing: A Unifying Guiding Principle.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

Blood Manganese and Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2026
Same author

Comparison of methods for assessing effects of risk factors on disease progression in Mendelian randomization under index event bias.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same author

No genetic evidence for an association of apolipoprotein A-I with cardiovascular outcomes at different LDL cholesterol levels: drug-target Mendelian randomization analyses.

Atherosclerosis·2026
Same author

The Authors Respond.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Opioid use disorder and dementia risk: evidence from observational and genetic analyses in diverse ancestry cohorts.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.1K

Outlier Detection in Mendelian Randomization.

Maximilian M Mandl1,2, Anne-Laure Boulesteix1,2, Stephen Burgess3,4

  • 1Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany.

Statistics in Medicine
|July 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian randomization (MR) methods can over-identify genetic outliers due to pleiotropy. This study introduces a novel method to correct for overdispersion in heterogeneity statistics, improving the accuracy of causal inference from genetic data.

Keywords:
Mendelian randomizationinstrumental variablesinvalid instrumentsoutlier detectionpleiotropy

More Related Videos

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information
09:37

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information

Published on: August 15, 2019

9.9K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.1K
Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information
09:37

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information

Published on: August 15, 2019

9.9K
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Mendelian randomization (MR) infers causal relationships using genetic variants as instrumental variables.
  • A core MR assumption is instrumental variable independence from outcomes, except via the exposure.
  • Pleiotropy, where variants affect outcomes through other pathways, violates this assumption and is common.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the overdispersion issue in heterogeneity statistics used to detect outlying genetic instruments in MR.
  • To develop a method for accurately identifying and removing pleiotropic instruments in Mendelian randomization analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a novel statistical method to correct for overdispersion in heterogeneity statistics.
  • Utilized an estimated inflation factor to identify and remove outlying genetic variants.
  • The method is applicable to both univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization.

Main Results:

  • The new method effectively corrects for overdispersion in heterogeneity statistics.
  • Accurate removal of outlying instruments due to pleiotropy was achieved.
  • Improved reliability of causal effect estimates in Mendelian randomization.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method enhances the robustness of Mendelian randomization by accurately accounting for pleiotropic effects.
  • This approach improves the identification of valid genetic instruments, leading to more reliable causal inference.
  • The method is suitable for use with readily available summary-level genetic data.