Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Saturated Fatty Acids Induce Ceramide-associated Macrophage Cell Death
Published on: October 31, 2017
The death of normality: Commentary on Fernandes, Gomes, and Morgado (2025)
1School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University.
Abstract:
Comments on Fernandes et al. (see record 2026-12254-001). Fernandes et al. offer a tempered and nuanced assessment of normality's proliferation in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), framing it as a definitional problem in need of clarification. Yet the steady rise of "normality"-related terminology across DSM editions-from eight mentions in DSM-I to 198 in DSM-5-signals not a semantic drift, but a deepening reliance on a concept that has never withstood serious epistemological scrutiny. "If psychiatry intends to continue relying heavily on the concept of normality," write Fernandes et al., "it should clarify how 'normal' relates to health and, ultimately, define what 'normal' truly means" (p. 605). But what if it should not? This commentary takes a more radical position: The term "normal" is not salvageable. Scientifically nebulous, culturally loaded, and historically tainted, normality is an epistemic relic better discarded than redefined. To their credit, Fernandes et al. acknowledge the growing traction of dimensional models of mental health, which move beyond rigid categories. But they stop short of confronting the conceptual deadweight "normal" brings into this future. A truly dimensional psychiatry cannot continue to rely on normality as a reference point. Doing so is akin to measuring nonlinear phenomena with a broken ruler. "Normal" presumes a fixed center against which deviation is judged-a logic that dimensional thinking must reject outright. We need a postnormal psychiatry-one that abandons the essentialist scaffolding of "normal versus abnormal" and instead builds on terms like distress, impairment, risk, and resilience. But even these must be situated within systems that account for power, culture, and structural inequality. Swapping in new words while retaining the same old architecture is not enough. The shift must be conceptual, not cosmetic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
Sustainable Development
Professional Values
The values that are the foundation of the nursing profession are altruism, autonomy, human dignity, and social justice.
First, altruism refers to the concern for the welfare and well-being of others without personal...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Introduction to Documentation and Reporting
Nursing documentation records essential information and details regarding a patient's care and treatment in written or electronic form. It is a critical aspect of nursing practice that involves documenting assessments, interventions, outcomes, and other relevant details about a patient's health status.
Documentation maps the patient's health journey by creating a comprehensive...
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
Global Regulatory Systems

