Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Risk factors associated with failure to rescue after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
Andres Ramos-Fresnedo1, Erin M Mobley1, Keouna Pather1
1Department of Surgery, University of Florida, 655 8th Street S, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
Objective:
To explore the clinical factors associated with failure to rescue (FTR) among patients who underwent minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE).
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of all adults (≥ 18 years) who underwent a MIE from September 2013 to September 2023. FTR was defined as mortality rate among patients who developed any postoperative complication (any Clavien-Dindo grade). Univariable logistic regression was used to determine which factors were associated with FTR and those significant at p < 0.05 were entered into a multivariable model. Additionally, a stratified analysis was performed to explore the factors associated with FTR among those patients who developed life-threatening complications (Clavien-Dindo 4).
Results:
A total of 282 consecutive patients underwent MIEs during the study period. Of these, 138 (49%) developed at least one complication and 11 (4%) were classified as FTR. On univariable analysis, patients > 75 years of age or with cardiac comorbidities were 4 times more likely (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.11-14.20, p = 0.033) and 4.7 times more likely (OR 4.70, 95% CI 1.19-18.58, p = 0.028) to experience FTR, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that age ≥ 75 years (OR 2.86, 95% CI 0.76-10.75, p = 0.120) and cardiac comorbidities (OR 3.75, 95% CI 0.91-15.50, p = 0.061) were associated with increased odds of FTR. Additionally, stratified univariable analysis among patients who developed life-threatening complications (Clavien-Dindo 4) showed no association with FTR.
Conclusions:
Age and cardiac comorbidities are risk factors associated with FTR in patients undergoing MIE. These findings highlight the importance of preoperative risk stratification and optimization, as well as patient-provider shared decision-making, to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. Further studies are needed to develop perioperative strategies to reduce the rates of failure to rescue and improve the overall survival of this population.
More Related Videos
09:04Low-Cost Single-Port LoCoSP Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy
Published on: September 11, 2021
04:05Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy
Published on: August 22, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...