Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017
Biomechanical analysis of trivergent, a new posterior lumbar spinal fixation system
Michael R Chojnacki1, Jon Serbousek2, Jill A Serbousek3
1Rush Medical College, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Background:
Pedicle screw fixation provides stability after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Traditional pedicle screw devices face several complications, including loose and broken screws. A strategy addressing these issues is to eliminate sources of failure and optimize the biomechanical advantage of using a "triangle" in these devices. The purpose of this study was to measure the biomechanical properties of the Trivergent spinal fixation system and compare it to a predicate construct (ie, an FDA approved similar device against which testing is compared), Here, we report the biomechanical results of a new plate-based, triangular fixation device.
Methods:
The ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) protocol included 3 forms of testing: static compression bending, static torsion, and dynamic compression bending. 3 predicate constructs, 3 Trivergent 60° constructs, and 3 Trivergent 75° constructs were tested in both static compression bending and static torsion. 3 predicate constructs, 4 Trivergent 60° constructs, and 7 Trivergent 75° constructs were tested in dynamic compression bending.
Results:
In static compression bending, the Trivergent 60°, Trivergent 75°, and predicate constructs tolerated average ultimate loads of 480 N, 550 N, and 400 N, and demonstrated average ultimate moments of 26.5 N-m, 30.2 N-m, and 18.6 N-m, respectively. In static torsion, the Trivergent 60°, Trivergent 75°, and predicate constructs tolerated average yield torques of 44 N-m, 34 N-m, and 20.5 N-m, and demonstrated an average torsional stiffness of 14 N-m/deg, 13 N-m/deg, and 5.22 N-m/deg, respectively. In dynamic compression bending, the Trivergent 60°, Trivergent 75°, and predicate constructs tolerated maximum loads of 300 N (maximum load tested), 230 N, and 160 N, respectively.
Conclusions:
Hardware failure in posterior spinal pedicle screw fixation devices is common, and includes issues such as screw migration and rod breakage. The Trivergent device was designed to address these complications by incorporating characteristics such as screw divergence and cortical bone engagement. This study provides evidence of the biomechanical strength of Trivergent, supporting its potential ability to improve outcomes for posterior lumbar fusion surgery. Future cadaveric and human studies would help to substantiate the utility of Trivergent in treating degenerative disc disease, spinal stenosis, and other pathologies of the lumbar spine.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
General Structure of a Vertebra
Space Trusses
At the core of a space truss lies the fundamental unit known as the tetrahedron. This structure is composed of six members that form a three-dimensional shape...
Space Trusses: Problem Solving
Consider a tripod consisting of a tetrahedral space truss with a ball-and-socket joint at C. Suppose the height and lengths of the horizontal and vertical...

