Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

12:09
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
Published on: March 19, 2014
23.7K
The Effects of Repeated Finger Flexion Movements on Self-Reported Affect and Reward System Activation Are Weak and
Marissa R Vander Missen1, Annaleis K Giovanetti1, Jerry S Fisher1
1Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, USA.
Journal of Clinical Psychology
|July 15, 2025
Summary
Repeated body flexion movements showed inconsistent effects on motivation and affect. These findings question the reliability of using physical actions to trigger approach-reward systems, highlighting potential biases in research.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Recent research questions the reliability of using body movements to activate motivational systems, such as approach-reward.
- The link between physical actions and motivational states requires further empirical investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the effect of a repeated flexion movement task on approach-reward system activation.
- To examine the impact of flexion movements on positive and negative affect.
- To assess the influence of flexion movements on persistence in challenging tasks.
Main Methods:
- Two pre-registered studies were conducted: a direct replication and a conceptual replication.
- Participants were randomly assigned to either a repeated flexion movement condition or an active control condition.
- Measures included approach-reward activation, positive and negative affect, and persistence on a laboratory task.
Main Results:
- Study 1 found greater positive affect in the flexion group, but no differences in approach-reward activation or persistence.
- Study 2 found greater approach-reward activation in the flexion group, but no differences in affect or persistence.
- Overall, effects of repeated flexion movements were inconsistent and weak across both studies.
Conclusions:
- The effects of repeated flexion movements on motivational systems, affect, and persistence are inconsistent and weak.
- The findings suggest that using body movements to activate approach-reward systems may not be robust.
- The study highlights the risk of cherry-picking positive findings, leading to a biased empirical literature.

