Iterative attack-and-defend framework for improving TCR-epitope binding prediction models
- Pengfei Zhang 1,2, Hao Mei 1,2, Seojin Bang 3, Heewook Lee 1,2
- Pengfei Zhang 1,2, Hao Mei 1,2, Seojin Bang 3
- 1School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, United States.
- 2Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, United States.
- 3Google DeepMind, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States.
- 0School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, United States.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.This study introduces an attack-and-defend framework to improve T cell receptor (TCR)-epitope binding prediction models by generating and learning from false positives. The method enhances model robustness against adversarial examples, crucial for T cell therapies and vaccines.
Area Of Science
- Immunology
- Computational Biology
- Artificial Intelligence
Background
- TCR-epitope binding prediction is vital for adoptive T cell therapy and vaccine design.
- Existing models suffer from false positives due to limited negative sample data.
- Current negative sample generation methods fail to address model-specific vulnerabilities.
Purpose Of The Study
- To develop a novel framework for systematically identifying and mitigating weaknesses in TCR-epitope prediction models.
- To enhance the robustness of TCR-epitope binding prediction models against false positives.
- To create a comprehensive adversarial negative dataset for model improvement.
Main Methods
- Propose an iterative attack-and-defend framework using reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF).
- Attack phase: Generate biologically implausible sequences to deceive prediction models.
- Defense phase: Incorporate identified false positives into fine-tuning datasets to improve detection.
Main Results
- Successfully applied the framework to five diverse TCR-epitope prediction models.
- Demonstrated significant improvement in models' ability to detect adversarial false positives.
- Created a combined dataset serving as a benchmarking tool for prediction models.
Conclusions
- The attack-and-defend framework effectively enhances TCR-epitope prediction model robustness.
- The generated adversarial dataset improves model performance and reduces false positives.
- This approach offers a new strategy for improving biological prediction models with limited negative sampling.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

