Motion artifacts and image quality in stroke MRI: associated factors and impact on AI and human diagnostic accuracy

Christian Hedeager Krag1,2,3, Felix Christoph Müller4,5, Karen Lind Gandrup4

  • 1Department of Radiology, University Hospital Copenhagen-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark. christian.hedeager.krag.01@regionh.dk.

European Radiology
|July 15, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Motion artifacts are common in brain MRI scans for suspected stroke patients, particularly in older adults and those with motor symptoms. These artifacts significantly reduce the accuracy of detecting intracranial hemorrhages for both artificial intelligence (AI) and radiologists.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Background:

  • Motion artifacts are a known issue in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), potentially degrading image quality and impacting diagnostic accuracy.
  • The prevalence of motion artifacts and their specific associations with patient characteristics in suspected stroke cohorts remain incompletely understood.
  • Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing diagnostic workflows and improving patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the prevalence of motion artifacts in brain MRI scans of suspected stroke patients.
  • To identify patient-specific factors associated with the presence of motion artifacts.
  • To evaluate the impact of motion artifacts on the diagnostic accuracy of both artificial intelligence (AI) tools and human radiologists.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of brain MRI scans from adult suspected stroke patients.
  • Expert neuroradiologist identification of reference lesions (ischemic, hemorrhagic, space-occupying).
  • Blinded assessment of image quality and motion artifacts by radiology residents.
  • Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between a CE-marked AI tool and radiology reports.
  • Multivariate analysis to identify factors associated with motion artifacts.

Main Results:

  • Motion artifacts were present in 7.4% of the 775 included MRI scans.
  • Increasing patient age and the presence of limb motor symptoms were independently associated with a higher likelihood of motion artifacts.
  • Motion artifacts significantly decreased the accuracy of hemorrhage detection, with a more pronounced effect on the AI tool (88% to 67%) compared to radiology reports (100% to 93%).
  • Detection of ischemic and space-occupying lesions was not significantly affected.

Conclusions:

  • Motion artifacts are a significant concern in brain MRI for suspected stroke, affecting approximately 7% of scans.
  • Elderly patients and those experiencing motor symptoms are more prone to motion artifacts.
  • These artifacts critically impair the accurate detection of intracranial hemorrhages, impacting both AI and human interpretation, highlighting the need for artifact mitigation strategies.