Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
Published on: June 9, 2023
An enhanced seasons optimization algorithm for numerical optimization and engineering design
Hojjat Emami1, Mojtaba Fardi2, Babak Azarnavid3
1Department of Computer Engineering, University of Bonab, Bonab, Iran. emami@ubonab.ac.ir.
Abstract:
This paper introduces an Enhanced Seasons Optimization (ESO) algorithm that significantly enhances the search performance and solution quality of the standard Seasons Optimization (SO) algorithm. The SO shows promising results for numerical and engineering optimization tasks, but has weaknesses in balancing exploitation and exploration, resulting in suboptimal solutions and premature convergence. To address these limitations, the ESO incorporates four key innovations: (i) a root spreading operator which enhances local exploitation, (ii) a wildfire operator that enhances the diversity of population, (iii) refined competition and resistance operators that strengthen solution quality and convergence performance, and (iv) opposition-based learning to avoid local optimums. The effectiveness of the ESO algorithm is examined through a comparative analysis against a diverse set of counterpart optimizers, including foundational and highly cited algorithms (PSO, DE), top-performing algorithms (CMAES, LSHES, RRTO, ALA, THRO), and novel nature-inspired algorithms (SO, HO, CBKA). The set of benchmarks comprises 25 numerical optimization functions and 4 engineering design problems. Statistical results demonstrate that the ESO significantly outperforms the original SO algorithm and exhibits competitive or superior performance compared to the counterpart optimizers regarding convergence performance and solution quality. Our key findings include: (i) ESO is the top-performing algorithm in 16 out of 25 of the numerical functions and 3 out of 4 engineering design problems; (ii) it achieved an average ranking of 3.68 in the Friedman test on all numerical benchmarks, outperforming all counterpart algorithms in solving numerical benchmarks; Meanwhile, the second-ranked THRO algorithm attains the average ranking of 4.5 on all functions; (iii) ESO generated the best results in shifted and composite numerical functions, and (iv) it obtained the best performance in the scalability analysis test on 1000-dimensional numerical problems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Numerical Calculations
The solution to a problem is obtained using different methods. While manually solving algebraic symbols is one of the most common methods, the graphical method is often preferred. Computers...
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Ampere-Maxwell's Law: Problem-Solving
To solve the problem, we can use the equations from the analysis of an RC circuit and Maxwell's version of Ampère's law.
For the first part of...
Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution: Problem Solving
This distribution function f(v) is defined by saying that the expected number N (v1,v2) of particles with speeds between v1 and v2 is given by
Fast Decoupled and DC Powerflow

