Patient experiences of tuberculosis treatment deferral after a trace Xpert Ultra result: a prospective cohort study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Diagnosing Pulmonary Tuberculosis with the Xpert MTB/RIF Test
Published on: April 9, 2012
Caitlin Visek1, James Mukiibi2, Mariam Nantale2
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 E. Monument st, 4th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. Cvisek@post.harvard.edu.
Background:
A "trace" result from the Xpert Ultra molecular tuberculosis test indicates Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA detection but may not always signify tuberculosis disease. Little is known about the experiences of individuals with trace results who are not immediately treated. We surveyed patients with trace results to better understand their experiences and preferences related to their uncertain tuberculosis status.
Methods:
We enrolled adults and adolescents with trace Xpert Ultra sputum results, plus individuals with positive (at a semiquantitative level greater than trace) results ("positive controls") and with negative results ("negative controls"), from community-screening and clinic settings in Kampala, Uganda between February 2021 and December 2024. After an extensive clinical, laboratory, and radiographic evaluation, participants not recommended to start tuberculosis treatment immediately were closely monitored with interval reassessments. Starting in September 2021, surveys captured participants' perceptions and preferences related to their uncertain tuberculosis status at baseline and one and six months later. We compared categorial variables using Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test with a significance level of 0.05.
Results:
A total of 329 people with trace sputum (PWTS), 241 positive controls, and 279 negative controls were enrolled. Among PWTS surveyed, 22% (28/129) and 23% (30/129) thought they were likely to have or develop tuberculosis, respectively, and most reported low associated anxiety initially (80%, 263/329) and during follow-up. While 53% (174/329) would have favored treatment at baseline if not in the study, only 30% (41/136) of those who remained untreated were inclined toward treatment at six months. Participants chose a sensitive hypothetical test, even with high false-positivity risk, over one with lower sensitivity.
Conclusions:
Most PWTS in our study reported a low self-perceived likelihood of having or developing tuberculosis and low anxiety during follow up. Deferring treatment for PWTS is acceptable to most patients when sufficient testing and monitoring are available; in other contexts, upfront treatment may be preferable.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...

