Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Using the Visual World Paradigm to Study Sentence Comprehension in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
Published on: October 3, 2018
Diagnostic efficacy of large language models in the pediatric emergency department: a pilot study
Francesco Del Monte1, Roberta Barolo2, Maria Circhetta3
1Department of Pediatric Emergency, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital-A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Background:
The Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) faces significant challenges, such as high patient volumes, time-sensitive decisions, and complex diagnoses. Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to enhance patient care; however, their effectiveness in supporting the diagnostic process remains uncertain, with studies showing mixed results regarding their impact on clinical reasoning. We aimed to assess LLM-based chatbots performance in realistic PED scenarios, and to explore their use as diagnosis-making assistants in pediatric emergency.
Methods:
We evaluated the diagnostic effectiveness of 5 LLMs (ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Gemini 1.5 Flash, Llama-3-8B, and ChatGPT-4o mini) compared to 23 physicians (including 10 PED physicians, 6 PED residents, and 7 Emergency Medicine residents). Both LLMs and physicians had to provide one primary diagnosis and two differential diagnoses for 80 real-practice pediatric clinical cases from the PED of a tertiary care Children's Hospital, with three different levels of diagnostic complexity. The responses from both LLMs and physicians were compared to the final diagnoses assigned upon patient discharge; two independent experts evaluated the answers using a five-level accuracy scale. Each physician or LLM received a total score out of 80, based on the sum of all answer points.
Results:
The best performing chatbots were ChatGPT-4o (score: 72.5) and Gemini 1.5 Pro (score: 62.75), the first performing better (p < 0.05) than PED physicians (score: 61.88). Emergency Medicine residents performed worse (score: 43.75) than both the other physicians and chatbots (p < 0.01). Chatbots' performance was inversely proportional to case difficulty, but ChatGPT-4o managed to match the majority of the correct answers even for highly difficult cases.
Discussion:
ChatGPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro could be a valid tool for ED physicians, supporting clinical decision-making without replacing the physician's judgment. Shared protocols for effective collaboration between AI chatbots and healthcare professionals are needed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in situations...

