Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

13.3K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
13.3K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

13.6K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
13.6K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

4.9K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
4.9K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.4K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural basis for selective and potent degradation of IRAK4 by KT-474.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

High-throughput protein target mapping enables accelerated bioactivity discovery for ToxCast and PFAS compounds.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Structural basis of NSD2 degradation via targeted recruitment of SCF-FBXO22.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Discovery of Small-Molecule Antagonists of PHF1 and 19 Demonstrates the Ligandability of PRC2 Accessory Proteins.

ACS bio & med chem Au·2026
Same author

Exploiting a Cryptic Pocket in DsbA through Structure-Guided Parallel Synthesis and Direct-to-Biology Screening.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Decoupling Product Selectivity in Electrocatalytic CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction by Steering the Interfacial Water Structure.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 15, 2025

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode
09:19

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode

Published on: June 4, 2021

3.5K

Exploring the Ligandability of 53BP1 through Fragment-Based Approaches.

Beatrice Chiew1, Menachem J Gunzburg1,2, Caroline A Foley2,3

  • 1Medicinal Chemistry, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.

ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
|July 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Researchers identified compounds targeting the 53BP1 protein, a key player in DNA repair. This discovery offers potential therapeutic strategies for cancers linked to BRCA-1 mutations by developing 53BP1 antagonists.

Keywords:
53BP1chemoinformaticsepigeneticsfragment screeningfragment-based drug designnuclear magnetic resonancesurface plasmon resonance

More Related Videos

Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery
06:26

Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery

Published on: May 16, 2021

5.0K
Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
08:35

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source

Published on: May 29, 2021

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 15, 2025

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode
09:19

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode

Published on: June 4, 2021

3.5K
Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery
06:26

Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorimetry for Screening in Fragment-based Lead Discovery

Published on: May 16, 2021

5.0K
Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
08:35

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source

Published on: May 29, 2021

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • 53BP1 is a crucial DNA damage response protein.
  • BRCA-1 mutations are linked to breast and ovarian cancers.
  • 53BP1 antagonists may counteract BRCA-1 mutation effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Identify compounds binding to the 53BP1 Tudor domain.
  • Develop structure-activity relationships for 53BP1 binders.
  • Explore 53BP1 as a therapeutic target for cancer.

Main Methods:

  • Fragment screening to identify initial binders.
  • Chemoinformatic workflow for analogue selection.
  • Structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis.

Main Results:

  • Identified fragment compounds that bind to the 53BP1 Tudor domain.
  • Developed near-neighbor analogues with improved binding affinity.
  • Established SAR for the identified compound series.

Conclusions:

  • The identified compounds are promising starting points for 53BP1 antagonist development.
  • This approach is effective for discovering hits against methyl-lysine reader proteins.
  • Targeting 53BP1 offers a potential therapeutic avenue for BRCA-1-associated cancers.