Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Fluorescence-microscopy Screening and Next-generation Sequencing: Useful Tools for the Identification of Genes Involved in Organelle Integrity
Published on: April 13, 2012
Nanorate sequencing reveals the Arabidopsis somatic mutation landscape
Cullan A Meyer1, Brad Nelms1,2,3, Robert J Schmitz1
1Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602.
None:
The rate and spectrum of somatic mutations can diverge from that of germline mutations. This is because somatic tissues experience different mutagenic processes than germline tissues. Here, we use nanorate sequencing (NanoSeq) to identify somatic mutations in Arabidopsis shoots with high sensitivity. We report a somatic mutation rate of 3.6x10-8 mutations/bp, ~4-5x the germline mutation rate. Somatic mutations displayed elevated signatures consistent with oxidative damage, UV damage, and transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair. Both somatic and germline mutations were enriched in transposable elements and depleted in genes, but this depletion was greater in germline mutations. Somatic mutation rate correlated with proximity to the centromere, DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility, and gene/TE content, properties which were also largely true of germline mutations. We note DNA methylation and chromatin accessibility have different predicted effects on mutation rate for genic and non-genic regions; DNA methylation associates with a greater increase in mutation rate when in non-genic regions, and accessible chromatin associates with a lower mutation rate in non-genic regions but a higher mutation rate in genic regions. Together, these results characterize key differences and similarities in the genomic distribution of somatic and germline mutations.
Related Concept Videos
Spontaneous and Induced Mutations
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell

