Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: August 7, 2017
Independence-based causal discovery analysis reveals statistically non-significant regions to be functionally
Madison Lewis1, Shaun Eack2, Nicholas Theis3
1Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Background And Hypothesis:
Traditional fMRI analyses often ignore regions that fail to reach statistical significance, assuming they are biologically unimportant. We tested the accuracy of this assumption using causal discovery based-analysis that go beyond associations/correlations to test the causality of one region's influence over the other. We hypothesized that the network of statistically significant (active network, AN) and non-significant regions (silent network, SN) causally interact and their features will causally influence psychopathology severity and working memory performance.
Study Design:
We examined AN and SN during N-BACK task on 25 FHR and 37 controls. Clusters with significantly different activations were juxtaposed to 360 Glasser atlas parcellations. The PC algorithm for causal discovery was implemented. Connectivity of regions with the highest alpha-centrality (HAC) were examined.
Results:
Seventy-seven Glasser regions were in the AN and the rest were silent nodes. Two regions showed HAC for FHR and HC. Among controls, one HAC region was silent (auditory association cortex) and the other one was active (insula). Among FHR, both were silent nodes (early auditory cortex). These HAC regions in both groups had bidirectional directed edges between each other forming a reciprocal circuit whose edge-weights causally "increased" magical ideation severity.
Conclusion:
Causal connectivity between SN and AN suggests that the statistically non-significant and significant regions influence each other. Our findings question the merit of ignoring statistically non-significant regions and exclusively including statistically significant regions in the pathophysiological models. Our study suggests that causality analysis should receive greater attention.
More Related Videos
09:01A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
Published on: May 7, 2014
08:36Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
Published on: March 21, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Significance Testing: Overview
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
Statistical Significance
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...