Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
Published on: October 25, 2024
Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Scoping Review
Apiwat Jongjakapun1, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan2, Jen Sothornwit1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, 123 Mittraphap Road, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.
This review of pectopexy for apical pelvic organ prolapse found heterogeneous evidence, with limited randomized controlled trials and underreported patient outcomes. More research is needed, especially from diverse settings.
Area of Science:
- Gynecology
- Urogynecology
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects many women, necessitating effective surgical interventions.
- Pectopexy is an emerging surgical technique that anchors prolapsed structures to the iliopectineal ligament.
- Evidence on pectopexy's efficacy and safety is still developing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and map the existing evidence on pectopexy for apical pelvic organ prolapse.
- To analyze study characteristics, surgical techniques, and reported outcomes of pectopexy.
- To identify gaps in the current literature regarding pectopexy.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search across multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, etc.) and citation searches.
- Inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and descriptive studies of pectopexy for POP-Q stage ≥2.
- Independent data extraction and descriptive synthesis of findings by two reviewers.
Main Results:
- Thirty studies (2715 women) were included, predominantly descriptive studies from Asia, utilizing laparoscopic pectopexy with mesh.
- Commonly reported outcomes included operative time, blood loss, prolapse recurrence, stress urinary incontinence, and fixation material complications.
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and subjective outcomes were infrequently reported.
Conclusions:
- Pectopexy procedures and outcomes are highly heterogeneous.
- Current evidence is limited, particularly from high-quality RCTs and low-resource settings.
- There is a need for more standardized reporting of subjective outcomes and PROMs in pectopexy research.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination

