Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

A Model for Perineural Invasion in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: January 5, 2017
Inadvertent cervical cancer: a narrative review
David Viveros-Carreño1, Nuria Agustí2, Juliana Rodríguez3
1Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo (CTIC), Unidad Ginecología Oncológica, Grupo de Investigación GIGA, Bogotá, Colombia; Clínica Universitaria Colombia, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Grupo de Investigación Salud de la mujer Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia.
None:
Inadvertent cervical cancer, defined as infiltrative cervical carcinoma diagnosed after a simple hysterectomy for presumed benign disease, remains clinically significant yet understudied. Despite the potential for eradication of cervical carcinoma through vaccination, screening, and early treatment, disparities in health care access continue to result in preventable cases, some of which are identified only postoperatively. This condition has long been recognized, yet its management remains undefined and is supported primarily by low- or very low-quality evidence. Diagnostic failures often stem from inadequate preoperative evaluation, missed follow-up of abnormal screening results, and insufficient re-excision with conization when indicated. Social determinants of health, including race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance status, contribute significantly to these lapses. The identification of invasive disease only postoperatively may negatively impact prognosis, even in early stages. Treatment strategies for inadvertent cervical cancer include observation, radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, and completion surgery, such as lymph node assessment with or without parametrectomy. While retrospective studies suggest similar oncologic outcomes across some strategies (eg, additional surgery or radiotherapy), the absence of prospective trials limits definitive conclusions. Furthermore, morbidity and quality-of-life outcomes are frequently underreported. To support clinical decision-making, we propose a risk-based classification of this condition, categorizing patients as very low, low, medium, or high risk. Until stronger evidence emerges, treatment decisions should be individualized based on tumor features, surgical approach, and patient preferences. This review summarizes current evidence, highlights gaps in knowledge, and offers a pragmatic algorithm for managing this complex clinical entity.
More Related Videos
06:57Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization as a Tool for HPV-Related Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis
Published on: June 14, 2019
04:33Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cancer
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Survival Analysis