Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
A Long-Term Single-Center Study: Motivations and Strategies in Implant Management for Breast Augmentation Revision
Zhaoyu Chen1,2, Yang Sun3, Hui Weng1,2
1Department of Plastic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Background:
Revision surgery after breast augmentation is performed for various reasons. Understanding the causes and patients' attitudes toward implant management (removal or replacement) is critical for improving outcomes.
Methods:
A retrospective review of medical records from 2015 to 2023 was conducted, categorizing patients by the reasons for revision surgery and implant management approach. Demographic information, implant duration, and postoperative satisfaction were collected, followed by statistical analysis of trends and outcomes.
Results:
A total of 133 patients (mean age 43.1) were included: 93 in the medical, 32 in the aesthetic, and 8 in the psychological groups. Of these, 94 opted for implant removal, and 39 chose replacement. Reasons for revision did not significantly influence implant management decisions. No significant differences were found in age, implant duration, or BMI across groups, whether categorized by reason for revision surgery or implant management. Common issues in the medical group included capsular contracture and implant rupture, while the aesthetic group cited shape dissatisfaction. Over 80% of patients reported high satisfaction with post-revision outcomes.
Conclusions:
Implant management decisions were not significantly affected by revision reasons or demographic factors. While medical complications primarily drive revision surgery, many patients seek surgery for subjective reasons. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive patient education, psychological support, and personalized surgical planning, with both implant removal and replacement achieving high satisfaction.
Level Of Evidence Iii:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
