Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

28.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.6K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.2K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.2K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

12.1K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Studying vocal annoyance with self-steered sound synthesis.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Acoustic estimation of voice roughness.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Nonlinear phenomena in vertebrate vocalizations: mechanisms and communicative functions.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Nonlinear vocal phenomena and speech intelligibility.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Acoustic context and dynamics of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian calls: the case of puppy whines.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

How to analyse and manipulate nonlinear phenomena in voice recordings.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Paper-based Devices for Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles
11:53

Paper-based Devices for Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles

Published on: April 3, 2015

11.5K

Can I trust this paper?

Andrey Anikin1

  • 1Division of Cognitive Science, Department of Philosophy, Lund University, Box 192, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden. andrey.anikin@lucs.lu.se.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|July 16, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers can identify flawed scientific studies by checking for fake data, insufficient data, incorrect analysis, and unjustified conclusions. Critical evaluation of published evidence ensures scientific integrity and prevents wasted research efforts.

Keywords:
PowerReplicationResearch integrityStatistics

More Related Videos

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper
05:40

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper

Published on: October 4, 2019

6.1K
Author Spotlight: Development of a Smartphone-Enhanced Paper-Based Device for Rapid Dengue NS1 Detection
06:00

Author Spotlight: Development of a Smartphone-Enhanced Paper-Based Device for Rapid Dengue NS1 Detection

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Paper-based Devices for Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles
11:53

Paper-based Devices for Isolation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles

Published on: April 3, 2015

11.5K
Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper
05:40

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper

Published on: October 4, 2019

6.1K
Author Spotlight: Development of a Smartphone-Enhanced Paper-Based Device for Rapid Dengue NS1 Detection
06:00

Author Spotlight: Development of a Smartphone-Enhanced Paper-Based Device for Rapid Dengue NS1 Detection

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Empirical research
  • Psychology
  • Scientific publishing

Background:

  • Replication failures and data falsification scandals have eroded trust in empirical research.
  • There is a growing demand for open science practices and reforms in academic publishing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To equip researchers with methods for identifying methodological and conceptual flaws in published studies.
  • To provide practical strategies for critically evaluating scientific evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common problems in published research.
  • Proposal of detection methods for: fake studies, insufficient data, incorrect data analysis, and unsupported conclusions.

Main Results:

  • Identified four key issues: study fabrication, inadequate data, flawed analysis (e.g., data dredging, assumption violations), and unjustified conclusions (e.g., null hypothesis significance testing issues, meta-analysis bias).
  • Proposed verification steps including inspecting author/journal profiles, requesting raw data, assessing effect size precision, and examining data plots.

Conclusions:

  • Critical evaluation of published research is essential for scientific integrity.
  • Researchers must verify methodology robustness and distinguish results from interpretations.
  • Developing critical appraisal skills prevents unproductive research and enhances scientific trustworthiness.