Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

456
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
456
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

178
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
178
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

292
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
292
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

274
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
274

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lessons Learned for Improving Trainee Engagement and Utilization of Education and Training Materials for Cancer Research.

Advances in cancer education and quality improvement·2026
Same author

Navigating Dual Burdens: Financial Burdens and Travel Burdens Among Rural-Dwelling Cancer Survivors.

Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center·2026
Same author

Guiding approaches to studying Alzheimer's disease: a scoping review of community engagement, health communication, and implementation science research.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

Racial Differences in Expected Versus Actual Costs of Cervical Cancer Screening among Low-Income, Underscreened Women in North Carolina.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Social Risk Burden among US Cancer Survivors across Adulthood: Evidence from the 2022-2023 BRFSS.

Cancer research communications·2026
Same author

Integrating Patient Engagement into Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics: Bringing the Patient Voice into Data-Driven Science.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026
Same journal

Who Pays, Who Gains? ACA Medicaid Expansions and Changes in Net Income and Tax Liability by Socioeconomic Status.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Attrition of the Midwifery Workforce: Understanding Factors Associated With Leaving the Profession.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Engaging Families in Pediatric Care Management: A Qualitative Study From the North Carolina Integrated Care for Kids Model.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Hospital-Physician Vertical Integration on Utilization-Driven Changes in Healthcare Spending for an All-Payer Population With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Sepsis Coding and Payment to U.S. Hospitals.

Health services research·2026
Same journal

Stagnation in Achieving Recommended Methadone Doses in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.

Health services research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K

Machine Learning Risk Stratification for Older Breast Cancer Survivors: Clinical Care Implications.

Stephanie B Wheeler1,2, Jason Rotter3, Lisa P Spees1,2

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Health Services Research
|July 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning accurately predicts adverse outcomes for breast cancer survivors. Factors like age and cost, not just cancer, drive these risks, guiding personalized care strategies.

Keywords:
Machine learningcancer survivorshiprisk stratification

More Related Videos

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

200
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

380

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.3K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

200
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

380

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Breast cancer survivorship presents complex health challenges.
  • Identifying survivors at high risk for adverse outcomes is crucial for effective management.
  • Existing prediction models may not fully capture the multifactorial nature of survivorship risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a machine learning-based clinical risk prediction algorithm.
  • To identify breast cancer survivors at high risk for adverse outcomes post-treatment.
  • To predict the risk of all-cause death, cancer-specific death, recurrence, and other adverse health events.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis using linked Surveillance and Epidemiology End Results (SEER) registry and Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey data.
  • Cross-validated random forest machine learning models were employed.
  • Prediction models were developed for adverse outcomes within 3 and 5 years post-treatment completion.

Main Results:

  • The algorithm demonstrated high out-of-sample accuracy for predicting adverse outcomes (e.g., 91.9% for overall adverse events, 97.5% for cancer-specific death).
  • Key predictors included geographic region, age, frailty, comorbidity, time since diagnosis, and out-of-pocket costs.
  • Significant rates of death, recurrence, and hospitalization for adverse events were observed within the follow-up period.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning models can accurately predict adverse survivorship outcomes in breast cancer patients.
  • Non-cancer-specific factors play a significant role in driving these adverse outcomes.
  • Risk stratification can inform personalized care, with high-risk survivors potentially benefiting from intensive care and low-risk survivors from primary care management.