Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Predicting interacting hotspots for nanobodies' binding using triplets of residues
Rahma Hamdani1, Damiano Cianferoni1, Raul Reche1
1Department of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
None:
Protein-protein interactions (PPI) are fundamental to cellular signaling, forming robust networks that govern critical biological processes such as immune response, cell growth, and signal transduction. Nanobody-based therapies have emerged as a key strategy for modulating PPIs, offering exceptional potential due to their high specificity, stability, and ability to access challenging epitopes on PPI interfaces inside cells. The rational design of nanobodies relies mainly on understanding and predicting their binding regions, particularly the residues that contribute the most to the binding energy (binding hotspots). Existing computational methods do not fully provide a scalable solution for hotspot identification in nanobody design, leaving a critical gap in the rational design of these therapeutics. Here, we present a scalable and structure-aware algorithm for hotspot prediction in nanobody design. The algorithm queries a curated database of triplets of interacting residues obtained from ~20,000 non-redundant PDB structures. We showed that these triplets contain structural and energetic information, being able to assess the stability effect of residue variations in protein structures, Pearson R = 0.63 (MSE = 1.58 kcal/mol). More important than effects on stability is the ability of the algorithm to predict binding hotspots of protein-protein generic complexes and more specifically in complexes containing nanobodies. HotspotPred reached an accuracy of 0.73 for hotspot residue identification in a protein interaction dataset of 1160 Alanine mutants and correctly identified in 63.4% of the cases we predicted at least 2 residues on the binding surface.
More Related Videos
08:31Biosensor-based High Throughput Biopanning and Bioinformatics Analysis Strategy for the Global Validation of Drug-protein Interactions
Published on: December 1, 2020
07:08Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Protein-protein Interfaces
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...