Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Quantifying Cognitive Decrements Caused by Cranial Radiotherapy
Published on: October 18, 2011
Decision regret in patients with head-and-neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy
Anna-Maria Tews1, Andreas Hinz2,3, Valentin Magnus1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Purpose:
Head-and-neck cancer patients often face decisions between treatment options with similar oncological outcomes. In this context, decision regret becomes a central concern, particularly within the framework of shared decision-making. This study aims to assess the prevalence of decision regret and identify associated risk factors among head-and-neck cancer patients.
Methods:
This cross-sectional observational study included patients who underwent curative radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Decision regret was assessed using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Additional patient-reported outcomes included health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychological distress, anxiety, depression, and fear of cancer progression (FoP).
Results:
Of 300 eligible patients, 192 participated and filled out the DRS. The median age was 59 years (IQR, 45-65), and the median time between the end of radiotherapy and study participation was 45.5 months (IQR, 24-68.5). No decision regret (0 points) in terms of radiotherapy was reported by 27 %, mild regret (1-25 points) by 34 %, and high regret (>25 points) by 39 %. The mean (SD) DRS score regarding radiotherapy, systemic treatment, and surgery was 23.6 (22.4), 20.8 (19.3), and 20.9 (22.2), respectively. Decision regret was associated with HRQoL (r = -0.34, p < 0.001), distress (r = 0.25, p < 0.001), anxiety (r = 0.20, p < 0.01), depression (r = 0.19, p < 0.01), and FoP (r = 0.29, p < 0.001). In the multiple regression, a poorer ECOG status (β = 0.18, p < 0.01), lower HRQoL (β = -0.22, p < 0.01), and higher FoP (β = 0.19, p < 0.05) were associated with decision regret.
Conclusions:
More than one-third of head-and-neck cancer patients report high decision regret. These findings highlight the need for enhanced shared decision-making to mitigate decision regret in head-and-neck oncology.
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...

