Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Three-Dimensionally Printed Microfluidic Cross-flow System for Ultrafiltration/Nanofiltration Membrane Performance Testing
Published on: February 13, 2016
Interaction of Layer-by-Layer Nanofiltration Membranes and PFAS: Filtration after Adsorption
Juan Luo1,2, Bowen Zhou2,3, Ning Xue1
1School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Abstract:
Removal of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) by nanofiltration (NF) membranes has been well-documented, but the impact of PFAS interaction with the NF separation layer on the permselectivity of layer-by-layer (LBL) NF membranes has yet to be explored. The work reported two different LBL membranes prepared with pairs of long-chain polyelectrolytes (PVAm/PSS, L/L) and short-chain polyelectrolytes (S/S) for analysis of the impact of PFAS adsorption on removal. Both L/L and S/S membranes showed high Na2SO4 rejection (99.9%) and PFAS removal rates in the range of 73.6∼98.8%. A strong positive correlation between the PFAS removal rate and molecular dimensions suggested size exclusion as the main separation mechanism. After filtration, the pore size of both membranes decreased and the surface zeta potential became more negative. The adsorption of PFAS in the S/S membranes was significantly greater than that of the L/L membranes; electrostatic interaction of PFAS with positively charged overcompensated PVAm was the key contribution. The adsorption of PFAS in the S/S membranes caused increased MgCl2 rejection and reduced Na2SO4 rejection. Contrary PFAS adsorption behavior in PEC and LBL membrane suggested PVAm overcompensation varied with the assembly process. This work highlights solute/membrane interactions as a new key factor for designing NF membranes for organic removal.
More Related Videos
09:09Layer-by-layer Synthesis and Transfer of Freestanding Conjugated Microporous Polymer Nanomembranes
Published on: December 15, 2015
09:04Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
Published on: April 18, 2019