Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Quantification and Whole Genome Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater and Air Samples
Published on: June 30, 2023
Comparison of RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR on Assessing Model Viruses in Wastewater
1Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
Reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) offers superior sensitivity for detecting low viral loads in wastewater compared to reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). RT-ddPCR is valuable for precise viral monitoring, especially with RNA extraction.
Area of Science:
- Environmental microbiology
- Molecular biology
- Water quality analysis
Background:
- Quantifying viral loads in wastewater is crucial for public health and environmental monitoring.
- Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, including RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR, are commonly used for viral quantification.
- Wastewater matrices present challenges due to varying physical and chemical characteristics and potential inhibitors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the performance of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) for viral load quantification in wastewater.
- To assess the impact of RNA extraction and wastewater matrix composition on the accuracy and sensitivity of both methods.
- To determine the optimal method for precise viral monitoring in diverse wastewater treatment stages.
Main Methods:
- A model virus, Pseudomonas phage Φ6 (Phi6), was spiked into synthetic and real wastewater samples collected from multiple treatment stages.
- Performance of RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR was compared with and without prior RNA extraction from wastewater samples.
- Viral quantification accuracy, sensitivity, and resilience to inhibitors and water quality variations were assessed.
Main Results:
- Both RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR showed comparable performance for high and medium viral loads.
- RT-ddPCR exhibited significantly higher sensitivity for detecting low viral loads, outperforming RT-qPCR in trace level detection.
- RT-ddPCR with RNA extraction demonstrated improved performance against inhibitors, but was more affected by water quality without extraction.
Conclusions:
- RT-ddPCR is a more sensitive method for quantifying low viral loads in wastewater compared to RT-qPCR.
- RNA extraction enhances RT-ddPCR's resilience to wastewater inhibitors, making it suitable for precise viral monitoring.
- Despite higher costs and processing time, RT-ddPCR's superior sensitivity and robustness justify its use in critical wastewater applications.
More Related Videos
12:32EPA Method 1615. Measurement of Enterovirus and Norovirus Occurrence in Water by Culture and RT-qPCR. Part III. Virus Detection by RT-qPCR
Published on: January 16, 2016
10:53Concentration of Virus Particles from Environmental Water and Wastewater Samples Using Skimmed Milk Flocculation and Ultrafiltration
Published on: March 17, 2023