Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Disproportionate Left Ventricular Enlargement in Mitral Valve Prolapse: Prevalence, Predictors, and Association With
Yan Topilsky1, Benjamin Essayagh2,3, Giovanni Benfari2
1Department of Cardiology Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv Israel.
Background:
Left ventricular (LV) end-systolic enlargement in severe degenerative mitral-regurgitation (MR) is a class I surgical trigger. Whether it occurs disproportionately to less-than-severe MR due to mitral valve prolapse and is associated with mortality are unknown. We aimed to analyze prevalence and association with survival of disproportionate LV enlargement in less-than-severe MR.
Methods:
A multicenter cohort international study enrolled 2848 consecutive patients (52% women, 69±16 years) with degenerative MR prospectively quantified and graded mild or moderate. Primary end point was survival under medical management. Secondary outcome was survival throughout follow-up stratified by performance of early mitral surgery within 3 months postdiagnosis.
Results:
Among LV remodeling parameters (abnormal end-diastolic diameter, LV end-systolic diameter [LVESD] absolute and indexed), LVESD ≥40 mm (present in 12.4%) was the sole independent associate of reduced survival (5-year 70±3 versus 76±9%; P=0.009). LVESD ≥40 mm was independently linked to larger body surface area, effective regurgitant orifice, and left atrium, and to male sex and diabetes. With multivariable comprehensive adjustment, LVESD ≥40 mm (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.005-1.53]; P=0.04) remained associated with excess mortality under medical management, even after adjustment for lowered ejection fraction (aHR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.13-1.95]; P=0.004) and in all patient subsets. Among patients with moderate degenerative MR and LVESD ≥40 mm, 22% underwent mitral surgery within 3 months, which was associated with superior survival, even after comprehensive adjustment (aHR, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.005-0.51]; P=0.002).
Conclusions:
Disproportionate LV enlargement in patients with less-than-severe degenerative MR is common, particularly with larger bodies, regurgitation, and overall cardiac remodeling. LVESD ≥40 mm is associated with worse survival independent of all baseline characteristics, even lowered ejection fraction, and represents a marker for risk stratification of patients who are generally not yet considered for medical or surgical/interventional treatment.
More Related Videos
07:42An Image Guided Transapical Mitral Valve Leaflet Puncture Model of Controlled Volume Overload from Mitral Regurgitation in the Rat
Published on: May 19, 2020
04:48Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management