Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025
Functional Imaging of Brown Fat in Mice with 18F-FDG micro-PET/CT
Published on: November 23, 2012
Modeling of a population-based input function (PBIF) using the Feng model in dynamic ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC whole body PET/CT
Thomas Godefroy1, Mathieu Pavoine2, David Bourhis2,3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, 2 Avenue Foch, Brest, 29200, France. thomas.godefroy@chu-brest.fr.
Background:
This study focuses on modeling a population-based input function (PBIF) in dynamic ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT exams, with the aim of developing clinically adoptable protocols. The PBIF is derived from an image-derived input function (IDIF), ensuring a non-invasive and standardized approach to tracer kinetic modeling.
Methods:
Patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors were included from the GAPETNET clinical trial (n = 37), divided into a PBIF modeling group (n = 20) and an independent validation group (n = 17). Dynamic whole-body (dWB) PET/CT imaging was performed using a Vision 600 PET/CT system. A population-based input function (PBIF) was modeled using the Feng approach and scaled to individual patient-specific IDIFs over two different time windows (sPBIF3 - 7: 25-55 min, sPBIF5 - 7: 40-55 min). The scaled PBIF was normalized to IDIF data from 6 to 55 min post-injection. A full individual patient-specific IDIF using data from 0 to 70 min post-injectionwas used as the reference for AUC and Ki comparisons. IDIFs and scaled PBIFs were compared by assessing the area under the curve (AUC) and radiotracer influx rate (Ki). Linear correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were conducted for AUC and Ki comparisons. Additionally, Mann-Whitney tests were performed to compare Ki values obtained with IDIF and sPBIF in both tumoral lesions and physiological organs.
Results:
The lowest mean relative AUC bias was observed with sPBIF3 - 7, calculated to be 2.7 ± 7.9%, and was slightly higher with sPBIF5 - 7 (7.35 ± 8.58%). The correlation coefficient (R²) with the sPBIFs was high, with a minimum of 0.95 for the sPBIF5 - 7. When analyzing Ki metrics, biases tended to be lower with the 40-55 min time window (Mean ± SD bias = 1.61 ± 3.33 for Ki max and 1.64 ± 2.96 for Ki mean). No significant differences in Ki values was observed with the sPBIFs compared to the IDIF (p > 0.05), for either tumoral lesion or physiological organs.
Conclusion:
Our study has demonstrated the feasibility the PBIF approach to estimate tumor or physiological Ki values from a shortened dWB ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET acquisition, using the Feng model.
