Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Deep versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade During Total Hip Replacement Surgery on Postoperative Recovery and Immune
Veerle Bijkerk1,2, Lotte M C Jacobs1, Wim H C Rijnen3
1From the Departments of Surgery.
Background:
Deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) enhances surgical working conditions in laparoscopic surgery. Whether this accounts for nonlaparoscopic surgery is not known. Additionally, the effect on clinical and patient-reported outcomes remains debated. In this study, the effect of deep NMB compared to moderate NMB during total hip arthroplasty (THA) on quality of recovery and postoperative inflammation is investigated.
Methods:
This single-center randomized controlled blinded trial comprised 100 patients undergoing THA treated with deep NMB (posttetanic count 1-2) or moderate NMB (train-of-four 1-2). Continuous or bolus administration of rocuronium was used. The primary end point was quality of recovery on postoperative day 1 (POD1), measured by the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire. The secondary end points were innate immune function and pain scores on POD1, measured by ex vivo production capacity of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-1β on whole blood stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and postoperative pain as rated by the numeric rating scale.
Results:
There was no difference in QoR-40 score on POD1 (mean difference -4.1, 95% confidence interval -10.9 to 2.8, P = .241). On POD 1, there was no difference in ex vivo production capacity of TNF (moderate NMB median [quartiles] 890 [532-1605] pg/mL, deep NMB 1113 [651-1716] pg/mL, P = .34, Mann-Whitney U test, median difference -125, 95% confidence interval [CI], -440 to 155) and IL-1β (moderate NMB 1148 [545-1970] pg/mL, deep NMB median 1386 [826-1940] pg/mL, P = .36, median difference [MD] -135, 95% CI, -470 to 191) on lipopolysaccharide stimulation. On POD1, there was no statistically significant difference in pain scores at rest (MD 1.10, 99.6% CI, -0.53 to 2.74, P = .049) and on movement (MD 0.94, 99.6% CI, -0.63 to 2.50, P = .080).
Conclusions:
No evidence was found for a beneficial effect of deep NMB compared to moderate NMB in THA regarding quality of recovery or postoperative inflammation.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...

