Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Numerical Verification of Tucuxi, a Promising Bayesian Adaptation Tool for Model-Informed Precision Dosing
Anne Ravix1, Annie E Cathignol2,3, Thierry Buclin4
1Center for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
None:
Tucuxi, a Swiss-developed Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD) software, aims to support clinical dosage decision-making to achieve therapeutic concentration targets. This study assessed its predictive accuracy compared to NONMEM, a gold-standard tool for Bayesian PK predictions. A panel of models was created to mimic various pharmacokinetic scenarios following oral, bolus, or intravenous administration. For each scenario, a virtual population of 4000 patients receiving doses ranging from 10 to 120 mg every 24 h was created. Sparse and rich profiles were simulated, with either one or four samples taken per patient. Tucuxi and NONMEM predicted concentrations at sampling times, trough (Cmin) and peak (Cmax) concentrations, and area under the curve (AUC0-24h) were compared by calculating their relative differences, mean prediction error (MPE) and relative root mean square error (RMSE). The bioequivalence criterion was additionally applied to compare AUC0-24h, Cmin, and Cmax. All the outcomes predicted by Tucuxi closely matched those predicted by NONMEM. A median of 99.8% of predicted concentrations at sampling times presented relative errors smaller than 0.1%. For all outcomes predicted, MPE and relative RMSE were 0% (-0.09, 0.07) and 0.82% (0%, 18.79%) respectively. The bioequivalence criterion, calculated for AUC0-24h, Cmin, and Cmax, was verified for all models, with median values of 100%. This project highlights Tucuxi's excellent predictive accuracy compared to NONMEM, demonstrating its reliability and potential for adoption in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...

