Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Force Classification

Force Classification

Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...

Classification of Systems-I

Classification of Systems-I

Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:

Classification of Systems-II

Classification of Systems-II

Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Efficacy and safety of shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: can we predict shunt response by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?

Clinical radiology·2024

Same author

Improved diagnostic performance of susceptibility-weighted imaging with compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding and neuromelanin-sensitive MRI for Parkinson's disease and atypical Parkinsonism.

Clinical radiology·2023

Same author

Image findings of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis involving the skull base.

Clinical radiology·2023

Same author

Detection rate of MR myelography without intrathecal gadolinium in patients with newly diagnosed spontaneous intracranial hypotension.

Clinical radiology·2022

Same author

Carotid Plaque Composition Assessed by CT Predicts Subsequent Cardiovascular Events among Subjects with Carotid Stenosis.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021

Same author

Prognostic Utility of Disproportionately Enlarged Subarachnoid Space Hydrocephalus in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Treated with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Lesion Explorer: A Video-guided, Standardized Protocol for Accurate and Reliable MRI-derived Volumetrics in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Elderly

Lesion Explorer: A Video-guided, Standardized Protocol for Accurate and Reliable MRI-derived Volumetrics in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Elderly

Published on: April 14, 2014

Development and validation of a deep learning-based automatic classification algorithm for the medial temporal lobe

S J Lee¹, D Lee², C H Suh³

¹Department of Radiology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

Clinical Radiology

|July 17, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning and machine learning models accurately classify medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) scores in patients with cognitive impairment, aiding in diagnosis and assessment.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Lesion Explorer: A Video-guided, Standardized Protocol for Accurate and Reliable MRI-derived Volumetrics in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Elderly

Lesion Explorer: A Video-guided, Standardized Protocol for Accurate and Reliable MRI-derived Volumetrics in Alzheimer's Disease and Normal Elderly

Published on: April 14, 2014

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

Area of Science:

Neurology
Artificial Intelligence
Medical Imaging

Background:

Medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) is a key indicator of neurodegenerative diseases.
Accurate MTA scoring is crucial for diagnosing cognitive impairment.
Manual MTA assessment can be subjective and time-consuming.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and validate deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) algorithms for automated MTA score classification.
To objectively and efficiently classify MTA in patients with cognitive impairment.

Main Methods:

Retrospective analysis of cognitive impairment patients' data (March 2017 - June 2021).
Development of DL and ML models for MTA classification, categorizing scores into (0/1), (2), and (3/4).
Separate classification for left and right MTA scores, validated using internal and external testing datasets.

Main Results:

The study included 1694 patients for training and 297 for internal testing, plus 400 for external testing.
Internal testing showed accuracies of 0.82 (left) and 0.87 (right) MTA classification.
External testing achieved accuracies of 0.82 (left) and 0.85 (right) MTA classification, with similar performance between DL and ML models.

Conclusions:

Both DL- and ML-based algorithms demonstrated high accuracy in classifying MTA scores.
Automated MTA classification shows promise for improving the diagnostic process in cognitive impairment.