Comparative efficacy of first-line therapies for PD-L1-negative advanced NSCLC: A network meta-analysis with

Jie-Tao Ma1, Mei-Qi Yang1, Shu-Ling Zhang1

  • 1Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China.

Abstract

Insights

Optimal first-line treatment for PD-L1-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves subtype-specific strategies. Dual immunotherapy and anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy offer comparable survival benefits, with bevacizumab-containing regimens for non-squamous NSCLC showing improved outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Immunotherapy
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Optimal first-line treatment for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable mutations is uncertain.
  • Histological subtype-driven strategies may improve outcomes in this patient population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare various first-line treatment regimens for PD-L1-negative advanced NSCLC.
  • To determine the efficacy of histology-driven treatment strategies in this patient group.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of 24 randomized controlled trials.
  • Inclusion of 5035 patients with PD-L1-negative advanced NSCLC.
  • Survival curve reconstruction and statistical analyses using R and Stata.

Main Results:

  • Anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy (CT) and anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 showed comparable efficacy in histology-unselected NSCLC.
  • Bevacizumab plus anti-PD-(L)1 plus CT demonstrated the longest median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in non-squamous NSCLC.
  • Anti-PD-1 plus CT significantly improved PFS and OS in squamous NSCLC, while anti-PD-L1 plus CT did not show significant benefits.

Conclusions:

  • Dual immunotherapy and anti-PD-1 plus CT offer comparable survival benefits for PD-L1-negative, histology-unselected NSCLC.
  • Personalized treatment strategies based on histology, such as bevacizumab-containing regimens for non-squamous and anti-PD-1 plus CT for squamous NSCLC, optimize patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
292
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
456
Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
7.8K
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
274