Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Creation of a Knee Joint-on-a-Chip for Modeling Joint Diseases and Testing Drugs
Published on: January 27, 2023
Individualizing NSAID therapy in axial spondyloarthritis: N-of-1 trials with Bayesian analysis
Mark C Hwang1, Seokhun Kim2, Shervin Assassi1,2
1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, John P. and Kathrine G. McGovern Medical School of Medicine at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Objective:
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease predominantly affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints. NSAIDs are first-line therapy, but individual responses vary widely. We evaluated the efficacy and patient preference of three NSAIDs (celecoxib, meloxicam and naproxen) through Bayesian N-of-1 clinical trials to optimize axSpA management.
Methods:
We conducted N-of-1 trials with 42 patients meeting ASAS criteria for axSpA. Each patient was asked to complete two cycles of randomized double-blind crossover comparisons of the three NSAIDs, each for 4 weeks. The primary end point was the change in the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS). Bayesian analysis assessed the average treatment effect of each NSAID based on individual patient responses.
Results:
Thirty patients completed the trial series. All three NSAIDs resulted in reductions in ASDAS overall across all individuals (posterior probability of benefit [PPB] >0.99 of >0 reduction). No single NSAID demonstrated superiority across all patients. Patient preferences varied, with individualized responses to NSAID therapy identified through Bayesian analysis. The preferred NSAID for each patient showed a larger reduction in ASDAS compared with the least effective NSAID (0.88 vs 0.12, PPB >0.99), with potential clinically important improvement (PPB [0.6] = 0.96).
Conclusions:
Applying N-of-1 trials and Bayesian analysis effectively optimized NSAID therapy for axSpA in terms of efficacy and accounting for side effect profile. This approach raises the possibility of more efficient systemic individualization than usual care.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04115098.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...

