Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Published on: June 7, 2015
Cone-beam CT-based estimations of prostate motion and dose distortion during radiotherapy
Karolina A Klucznik1, Thomas Ravkilde2, Simon Skouboe1
1Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Background And Purpose:
Intra-fractional prostate translational and rotational (6DoF) motion can cause dose distortions. As intra-fractional motion monitoring is often unavailable, this study compares three methods to use pre- and post-treatment cone beam CTs (CBCT) to estimate prostate positioning errors during treatment and their dosimetric impact.
Material And Methods:
Eighteen patients received prostate radiotherapy with pre-treatment CBCT setup. For 7-10 fractions per patient (total:174), triggered kV-images were acquired every 3 s during beam-on and a CBCT was acquired post-treatment. The 6DoF prostate position error during treatment was determined from the kV-images (ground truth) and estimated from the CBCTs assuming a static position as in the pre-CBCT(Scenario1), a linear drift between pre- and post-CBCT position(Scenario2) or a static position as in the post-CBCT(Scenario3). The positioning errors and prostate dose from each scenario were compared with the ground truth.
Results:
Scenario1 was inferior to the others with prostate position root-mean-square errors of 1.1 mm(LR), 1.7 mm(AP) and 1.8 mm(CC). Scenario2 and 3 were similarly accurate with root-mean-square errors of 0.5 mm(LR), 0.9 mm(AP) and 0.8 mm(CC) (Scenario2) and 0.6 mm(LR), 1.1 mm(AP) and 0.9 mm(CC) (Scenario3). The prostate position errors reduced the CTV D99.5% by more than 2/3 % at 24/15 % of the fractions, respectively. The sensitivity in detecting these dose deficits was low for Scenario1 (9-16 %) and considerably higher for Scenario2 (68-76 %) and Scenario3 (86-91 %). All scenarios showed high specificity (93-99 %).
Conclusion:
Using the post-CBCT prostate position, acquired right after treatment, performed best in detecting intra-fractional prostate position errors and CTV dose deficits. It offers a scalable and conservative estimate of motion-induced dose distortions.
More Related Videos
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography