The impact of nirsevimab prophylaxis on RSV hospitalizations: a real-world cost-benefit analysis in Tuscany, Italy

Vieri Lastrucci1, Martina Pacifici2, Giorgia Alderotti1

  • 1Epidemiology Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy.

PubMed

Insights

Nirsevimab prophylaxis for infants significantly reduces Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) hospitalizations. A universal strategy offers broad protection, while targeted approaches show higher cost-benefit ratios, balancing economic impact with public health benefits.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is a primary cause of infant hospitalizations.
  • Nirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody, offers extended RSV prophylaxis for all infants.
  • This study evaluates the cost-benefit of nirsevimab prophylaxis strategies in Tuscany, Italy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the cost-benefit of different nirsevimab prophylaxis strategies for infants during their first RSV season.
  • To compare these strategies against existing prophylaxis practices, including palivizumab.
  • To determine the impact on RSV-associated hospitalizations and healthcare costs.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis from a healthcare payor perspective using real-world data from the Tuscany birth cohort (N=21,017).
  • Evaluation of three nirsevimab prophylaxis strategies versus current practices for the 2023/2024 RSV season.
  • Calculation of net benefit and benefit-cost ratio (BCR), considering RSV-associated and severe hospitalizations.

Main Results:

  • Current practices led to 663 RSV hospitalizations (€5,247,645).
  • Universal nirsevimab prophylaxis avoided 378 hospitalizations with a BCR of 0.96.
  • A targeted seasonal strategy with catch-up for preterm infants yielded the highest BCR (1.56), preventing 270 hospitalizations.

Conclusions:

  • Universal nirsevimab prophylaxis substantially reduces infant hospitalization burdens without significant economic strain.
  • While targeted strategies are more cost-effective, universal prophylaxis maximizes public health impact by preventing more hospitalizations.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer01:03

Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer

Rous Sarcoma virus or RSV was discovered by F. Peyton Rous in the year 1911 as a filterable transmissible agent that could cause tumors in chickens. He won a Nobel Prize for this discovery in 1966. His experiments clearly demonstrated that some cancers could be caused by infectious agents and led to the discovery of many more cancer-causing viruses in animals as well as humans.
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand  RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...
5.4K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
695
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
177
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
348