Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

A High-Throughput Multiplexed Screening for Type 1 Diabetes, Celiac Diseases, and COVID-19
Published on: July 5, 2022
Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analyses in Health Screening Programs for Type 2 Diabetes and Liver Disease:
Felice Cinque1,2,3, Clara Long1,2, Duy A Dinh4
1Chronic Viral Illness Service, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
This review found no studies on screening for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in type 2 diabetes patients. Further research is needed to develop patient-centered screening programs.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Public Health
- Health Economics
Background:
- Screening programs for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and liver diseases are crucial for early detection and management.
- Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is an emerging liver condition often associated with T2D.
- Quantifying stakeholder preferences is essential for designing effective and acceptable screening programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To summarize evidence on discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and conjoint analyses (CAs) for stakeholder preferences in T2D and liver disease screening.
- To specifically assess the application of DCEs/CAs to MASLD screening within the context of T2D.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive scoping review of five databases (MEDLINE, PubMed Central, EMBASE, Europe PMC, Google Scholar) was conducted.
- Studies published after January 1990 in English, French, or Spanish using DCE/CA for T2D and liver disease screening were included.
- Two independent reviewers screened deduplicated records.
Main Results:
- Nine studies (7 high-income, 2 low-income countries) were included, focusing on various liver diseases, hepatitis, and cardiovascular conditions, but not MASLD in T2D.
- Stakeholders included patients, healthcare providers, and the general population.
- Key attributes influencing choices were screening sensitivity, setting, duration, provider, cost, and physician support for treatment.
Conclusions:
- There is a significant gap in research regarding stakeholder preferences for MASLD screening in T2D patients.
- The development of DCEs for MASLD screening is urgently needed to inform patient-centered care pathways.
- Future research should prioritize understanding preferences to optimize screening program design and implementation.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
04:46'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
Published on: September 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.