Clinical Translation of Integrated PET-MRI for Neurodegenerative Disease

The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias is increasing as populations live longer lifespans. Imaging is becoming a key component of the workup for patients with cognitive impairment or dementia. Integrated PET-MRI provides a unique opportunity for same-session multimodal characterization with many practical benefits to patients, referring physicians, radiologists, and researchers. The impact of integrated PET-MRI on clinical practice for early adopters of this technology can be profound. Classic imaging findings with integrated PET-MRI are illustrated for common neurodegenerative diseases or clinical-radiological syndromes. This review summarizes recent technical innovations that are being introduced into PET-MRI clinical practice and research for neurodegenerative disease. More recent MRI-based attenuation correction now performs similarly compared to PET-CT (e.g., whole-brain bias < 0.5%) such that early concerns for accurate PET tracer quantification with integrated PET-MRI appear resolved. Head motion is common in this patient population. MRI- and PET data-driven motion correction appear ready for routine use and should substantially improve PET-MRI image quality. PET-MRI by definition eliminates ~50% of the radiation from CT. Multiple hardware and software techniques for improving image quality with lower counts are reviewed (including motion correction). These methods can lower radiation to patients (and staff), increase scanner throughput, and generate better temporal resolution for dynamic PET. Deep learning has been broadly applied to PET-MRI. Deep learning analysis of PET and MRI data may provide accurate classification of different stages of Alzheimer's disease or predict progression to dementia. Over the past 5 years, clinical imaging of neurodegenerative disease has changed due to imaging research and the introduction of anti-amyloid immunotherapy-integrated PET-MRI is best suited for imaging these patients and its use appears poised for rapid growth outside academic medical centers. Evidence level: 5. Technical efficacy: Stage 3.