Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
The Perfect Orthopedic Surgery Applicant?: Exploring Trends in the National Resident Matching Program "Charting
Cameron Gerhold1, Pavlo Kravchuk1, Rushabh Shah1
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida.
Introduction:
This study examines trends in applicant characteristics for orthopedic surgery residency from 2016 to 2024, focusing on changes in match rates, academic performance, and research productivity. It highlights the impact of key shifts such as the transition to pass/fail grading for USMLE Step 1 and the MD-DO residency merger. The study aims to provide insights into how selection criteria have evolved and what future applicants, medical schools, and residency programs should consider when navigating the competitive field of orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study is to examine the landscape of orthopedic surgery residency applications from 2016 to 2024, and analyze key trends in applicant characteristics, academic performance, and match rates.
Methods:
This was a retrospective review of objective characteristics of both matched and unmatched applicants to orthopedic surgery. Data was sourced from NRMP, Charting Outcomes in the Match and was inclusive of years 2016 to 2024 with every other application cycle. All collected data was separated based on applicant type, divided between U.S. allopathic and U.S osteopathic.
Results:
Between 2016 and 2024, U.S. allopathic seniors consistently had the highest match rates for orthopedic surgery residency, with 74.3% matching in 2024, though unmatched applicants also increased over time, reflecting growing competition. U.S. osteopathic seniors showed improvements in their match rates, rising from just 4 matches in 2018 to 93 in 2024, while unmatched applicants also grew. Academic performance metrics, including USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores, revealed a rising emphasis on Step 2 CK after Step 1's transition to pass/fail reporting. Research productivity notably increased across applicant groups, but was not the sole determinant of success in matching. Applicants with AOA membership and those from Top 40 NIH-funded medical schools had higher match rates, with AOA membership providing a particularly significant advantage.
Conclusion:
This analysis of orthopedic surgery residency match data from 2016 to 2024 reveals increasing competitiveness, with a shift in focus from Step 1 scores to Step 2 CK and research productivity. U.S. osteopathic applicants continue to face challenges, but with strong academic performance and strategic applications, success remains attainable, prompting the need for further research into selection criteria and long-term outcomes.
